“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Now, you have a lot to do now, but consciously you are not aware of what you do, and little by little you must learn to accept greater and greater portions of your own reality in this life and future lives. [...]

Now, since in the dream state you are able, quite easily, to perceive the future, why do you find it such a frightening thing to do when you are awake? [...]

The historical and cultural world as you know it appears to be the only one objective world, of course, with its history already written, its present, and hopefully its probable future.

It seems also that the future must be built upon that one known species or world past. [...]

[...] All of this directly affects your own personal and joint—I will have to use the term for you —future, experience; both in this life and later.

We will in the future deal with the problem of evil, and hint of some of its implications in our life after death material.

[...] This was after she had gone through an auto accident; Seth has told us this accident is in reality two accidents, one involving B. Macdonnel in California, the other a future possible event involving Tam’s girl Eve, in or near New York City. [...]

(In the 436th session Seth advised caution on Eve’s part in order to forestall or change the probabilities re this future accident. [...]

[...] The classes have already indeed altered your future though you may not particularly like my saying so. [...]

[...] He saw himself trying to walk without the table the other morning, spontaneously, and before breakfast—a sign of future physical motion of that nature. [...]

[...] The straightforward attitude will save us difficulties in the future. [...]

[...] These, you see, are electrical realities, which may explain their importance; for you not only sometimes predict so-called future events, but you create their actuality within the electrical field, and therefore insure their existence one way or another within the physical field.

[...] Your creations in the electrical universe may be said to appear as your future in the physical universe. [...]

(The Future Is Now, by Arthur W. Osborn. [...]

[...] If you could perceive these dreams then you would have a good idea of the main physical events of the future, because you would see them being born.

[...] The center contains condensed knowledge, not only of seemingly past lives, but also of the future. [...]

[...] And so the landscape, not one but many landscapes in one, for while it is unique in a given moment, still it is a composite in your terms of the pasts that have formed it, and the futures that act upon it even now.

[...] But in your terms, Seth Two is far further divorced from my reality than I am from Ruburt’s. You can imagine Seth Two as a future portion of me if you prefer, and yet far more is involved.

[...] Though it seems to you that reincarnational existences involve past and future events, they are existences parallel or adjacent to your own present life and consciousness. [...]

It seems to you that any personality worth its salt must have a series of memories, of events that existed in the past and progressed to a present and a future. [...]

In your terms then, a future event would exist before a past event. [...]

[...] There he has anticipated future feedback that he relies upon.

The point of such contact can indeed be mathematically shown, and in the future I shall do just that. [...]

The individual was also bewildered however because he was able to perceive you in what you would call both your future and your past, as well as your present.

(This sounds very much like the use of what Seth calls the third, fourth and fifth inner senses: Perception of past, present, and future; the conceptual sense; cognitionof knowledgeable tissue. [...]

[...] When you react in such a manner, not only do you focus upon the present difficulty, but you project the difficulty and its imagined consequences into the future, turning expectation against you, and therefore bringing about the very conditions which you wish to avoid.

(Any trouble that developed would be the result of present trends involving Leonard, and at this time these trends were so general it was impossible to pinpoint future events with any certainty. If the present trends were changed, the personality of the future trouble would change also. [...]

[...] In the future I will expand enough to be able to include them in my awareness without fear of personal threat, which impedes me at the moment. [...]

[...] This led into a discussion about computers, and Bill Gallagher’s personal idea of studying up on them for future use in business. [...]

In the far future instruments may detect them completely. In the near future glimpses will be perceived with the use of instruments, but use and recognition of the inner senses will result in a quicker recognition.

[...] This point of over lapse, or overlap, this point of overlap is extremely important, for there are points of overlapping in all universes; and this will also be a be a basic factor in travel, although not in any future in the physical universe in which you will be involved.

In thinking in terms of consecutive time, however, evolution does not march from the past into the future. Instead, precognitively the species is aware of those changes it wants to make, and from the “future” it alters the “present” state of the chromosomes and genes (see Note 14) to bring about in the probable future the specific changes it desires. [...]

9. Seth prepared the way for these statements by declaring in the 684th session, in Volume 1: “It is truer to say that heredity operates from the future backward into the past, than it is to say that it operates from the past into the present. Neither statement would be precisely correct in any case, because your present is a poised balance affected as much by the probable future as the probable past.”

The spacious present does not contradict the existence of a future as you conceive it. [...]

[...] Jane’s own material — including whatever she comes up with in the future — ought to be integrated with Seth’s, also, and eventually we hope to find time to do this. [...]

[...] Only people who trust their spontaneous beings and the altruistic nature of their impulses can be consciously wise enough to choose from a myriad of probable futures the most promising events — for again, impulses take not only [people’s] best interest into consideration, but those of all other species.

How do your impulses affect your future experience, and help form the practical world of mass reality?

The main issue is of course not to project negatively into the future, for there you are borrowing trouble. [...]

(Lest some hypothetical readers of this material in the future regard Jane and me as idiots, incapable of learning, I’d like to note in our own defense that we’ve made many efforts to put the symptom situation out of mind as much as we’re capable of, yet it doesn’t leave us. [...]

[...] Some of these have already begun to vanish, but both of you to some extent project them into the future, treat them as conditions in fact, and not as beliefs that cause conditions.

[...] See yourselves in a future in which this session has long ago been given and followed with excellent results.