“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] If Dunne were able to write another book now, on his time theories, he would be able to correct several of his well-intentioned errors.

[...] The same sort of error here exists concerning the life force, as I mentioned. [...]

[...] This is an error that is precisely due to that which Priestley himself abhors: distortions in thought caused by reliance upon the concept of time as a series of moments.

[...] But he also fell into an understandable error. [...]

[...] That it is good and that those who told it anything else were in grave error. [...]

In the overall structure, all seeming errors are indeed redeemed, forming syntheses of creativity of their own kind, leading to understandings and future developments that, say, outshine whatever problems you might have encountered. [...]

[...] Then I let him alone, and see if he can tell by himself when he makes an error, for it is this inner manipulation that we are interested in perfecting. [...]

[...] For now there are simply some errors he has made, both in expecting too much on the one hand, and not expecting enough on the other. [...]

[...] Because of your time misconceptions you make serious errors whenever you attempt any predictions into life after death, or life within other systems than your own. [...]

[...] The error led to some confusion on our parts for a while.)

[...] Certainly “a great psychic teacher” had a responsibility of some weight (ironically humorous), and therefore it seemed imperative to Ruburt that he not make errors, that he live up to the characteristics generally ascribed to such an image. [...]

[...] The new product may be the result of an error, for its benefits are not yet realized. [...]

[...] You imagine future distractions, yet when Ruburt projects his symptoms into the future, you see clearly his error—though he may not.

[...] I believe I have solved some of them, or at least am embarked on the right course after a very long period of trial and error. [...]

[...] I have to correct an error on page 134 in that session. [...]

[...] In the terms of your earthly experience, it is a metaphysical, a scientific, and a creative error to separate matter from consciousness, for consciousness materializes itself as matter in physical life.

[...] Something about her not being able to trace the skein of payments and errors through their computer, she said. [...]

[...] In larger terms no error was made. [...]

[...] Yet a trial and error period is extremely necessary, and in your cases natural, and should not lead to discouragement.

[...] Note the error, 1985, in the postmark; I thought Seth might comment on this but he did not. [...]

[...] The fact is that they can never be condoned, and yet they must be understood for what they are: man learning through his own errors. [...]

[...] I shall see what a good teacher your Ruburt is, and I shall correct him if he makes errors. [...]

Again, it is involved with the trial-and-error method. [...]