“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] For reasons I will not go into now, and speaking simply, you are coming into a fertile period, each of you—in part because of changed beliefs, so that your relationship with Framework 2 is more intimate, practically speaking, now—and I would like you to take advantage of that.

(My personal problems developed in force when I began to be overly concerned with my creative “work” as work, as it applied to the world, as it would be received and interpreted; when I tried to compare its reception to other officially accepted activities—that people understood—when I tried to look at my “work” through their eyes, and when I began to expect the kind of honor and approbation given to others—who conformed.

I would like to speak on some of the topics that were discussed in our last session. [...]

[...] If you could fully understand or comprehend directly the reality of a thought in its full actuality, you would be amazed at the power behind it.

[...] The meaning, so to speak, must be separated and made meaningful to many psychological areas, some of which would not even seem to speak the same language.

(I would also like to state here that Jane’s predictions, made daily, have recently begun to prove out with what seems to be an amazing frequency. [...]

[...] I would like you, then, to think of those units of consciousness from an entirely different scale of events.

[...] The “speed” of electrons, for example, would reflect their psychological motion.

[...] I wanted to know whether using the spray would constitute a crutch that might delay Jane’s recovery.

[...] In Ruburt’s case the bifocals would have been detrimental. [...]

[...] What would you say if someone else came to you with the same reasons?

The loving acknowledgement of their own uniqueness would in itself show them how to begin to use their own abilities in their own way, and to trust their present situation. [...]

[...] You will literally see only what you want to see.² If the race believed that space travel was impossible, you would not have it. [...]

[...] If only one were provided you would have no choice. [...]

(As we sat for the session, Jane reminded me that she thought Seth would do an introduction tonight for her own book on Paul Cézanne. [...]

If you did not do what you did today, for example, the entire world would be in some way different.

[...] The massacre of the Jews in the Second World War, in the numbers that existed, would not happen now, for the eyes of the world could not be kept out now, as they were then.

(9:42.) Now: I can’t—nor would I want to—turn you into children again, but you have a natural optimism, both of you—a creature optimism, with which all are innately equipped. [...]

[...] Tonight she not only did feel like a session, but shortly before it told me that she believed the larger Seth personality, the Seth entity as we call it, would speak.

In your terms then, a future event would exist before a past event. [...]

[...] I explained to Jane some thoughts I’d had in bed last night—that her returning home in reasonably good shape would solve all of our major challenges at this time: her career, income, insurance problems, physical freedom, the ability to travel if we chose—all of them, freeing us to start leading some sort of more-or-less normal lifestyle. [...]

(4:20 p.m. “I had the feeling it would be for us, instead of dictation,” Jane said. [...]

[...] He will then speak to you, but not as he would like to speak… He is now living in a town beginning with the letter A.

[...] I know it’s there, and that in certain cases at least, it would be very helpful if we could get it.)

[...] Those affiliations fell into being as all of the consciousnesses that were embarked upon physical reality divided up (long pause) the almost unimaginable creative achievements that would be responsible for the physically effective world.

[...] Ruburt would want to walk correctly now, of course, and then to have his arms straightened, or his posture gradually improved. [...]

[...] [We hardly ever talk about whatever personal involvement either of us might have had with reincarnation, incidentally, regardless of whether any such lives would be based upon Seth’s ideas of simultaneous time and probabilities, or upon time as a series of successive moments.] Jane did know that the rest of the session would be for her, though. [...]

(Pause.) A loving technology, again, would always add to the qualitative and spiritual deepening of experience. [...]

[...] You would interpret these events as space and time, and so often I must use the terms, for I must use your language rather than my own.

[...] An idea would be projected out there by us against this field so that it seemed to explode. [...]

[...] Energy is self-renewing, and indefinite duration of pattern would lead to dead ends. [...]

[...] I did not realize that you would become so concerned. [...]