“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Was it possible that during the complicated rhythms of history, man could have been man (at least approximately as we know him) even before the Tertiary Period, then moved into a long cycle of animal-man forms before returning to being man again? [...]

[...] Within the earthly cycle, such knowledge is not transmitted to the physical brain, but it is always known.

[...] At once I realize that somewhere — I don’t understand where — Carl does not own a cycle and that the two of us are man and wife, and have a baby. It is as though I am remembering physical life as a dream, and yet I have the feeling that Carl and I have done this cycle bit before, that we are doing it still in another place and that we will do it even as we are doing it now. [...]

[...] Ruburt finally did put an end to his menstrual cycles a good deal earlier than might have happened otherwise. [...]

(11:32.) Physically, your body must follow the nature into which you were born, and in that context the cycle of youth and age is highly important. [...]

Your temperaments are different, yet in your way at a somewhat later area, you experience the same kind of phenomena in a yearly cycle. [...]

There is a constant give and take between psychic and chemical components which actually cause your daily weather, your weather cycles, seasons, droughts and storms. [...]

(According to Seth, each individual chooses the time and place of every “life” in his reincarnational cycle.)

[...] Both of us were looking for ways to break the cycle of symptoms. [...]

(Pause at 9:16.) There are cycles in which consciousness forms earthly experience, and maps out historical sequences. [...]

[...] To some extent your own life-and-death cycles are simply another aspect of the hibernation principle as you understand it. [...]

Beside this you thought sometimes that Ruburt thought of nothing but himself, and you were saying “Look at me, I am no superman,” and so actually you were looking for communications that it seemed you did not want in the early part of the cycle.

[...] It’s a cycle but does it eventually all go back to the seed?”)

[...] It schematically shows the relationship of the individual birth-to-death cycle (including probable events), to the other, successively less differentiated kingdoms or realities that help make up the world. [...]

Although in this note I’ve stressed the “what-might-have-been” aspects of that second question, the same thinking can apply to the first one also, in which I wanted to know how many families of consciousness might be chosen by the reincarnating personality during its “cycle” of simultaneous lives. [...]

[...] Remember what you were saying earlier about cycles. [...]

There is a sacrament here that you do not understand, and when you gobble down food indiscriminately, and when you do not give silent recognition to the fact that what you eat once lived, then you lose contact with a certain sacred heritage and deny yourself a certain part of a cycle in which you rightly, as physical creatures and as spiritual creatures, have a part. [...]

[...] The violets on our hypothetical mountainside contribute to the life of the mountain even while they have their own independent reality, and the overall cycle of the seasons regulates the growth and development of the mountain and all of its manifestations.

For one thing, and I will go into this deeper shortly, those who now know existence on the physical level more or less because of certain cycles lived before on the physical level at about the same historical periods. [...]

[...] If the psychic developments that represented your greatest fulfillment, with all their ramifications in your art and life, had not occurred, then you would have had two children, and continued a reincarnational cycle. [...]

[...] In those times, death was not feared as it is in your terms, now, for the cycle of consciousness was understood.