“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] However later in our session I will discuss this, as it does contain some validity in theory.

I said that your conventional geological ages were faulty, along with your theories of the age of the earth, for it is far older than is supposed. [...]

[...] You are bounded by your cause and effect theories. [...]

The third inner sense, as I have told you, will enable you to some extent to free yourselves from the constructions of past, present and future, and will permit in theory instant cognition. [...]

Remember that reincarnation does not contradict the theory of the spacious present, for such lives within the spacious present are simultaneous. [...]

You may believe in an afterlife to some extent or another, or you may or may not be convinced by the general theory of reincarnation. [...]

[...] In historic terms, early man, using here your theories about the race — early man — was in intimate contact with his family, clan, or tribe. [...]

Your theories of time are connected with your usual neurological pulses. [...]

[...] Seth’s analogy with the bank accounts and Frameworks l and 2 is an excellent one, of course, and in theory at least I agree with it completely.

[...] The same goes for the current theories of “the origin of life” in scientific terms. [...]

[...] In that piece Seth has come through with an excellent capsule explanation of his theory of “world views.” [...]

1. In Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality Seth began developing his theory of counterparts — that the larger psychological self, or entity, of each of us manifests not just one physical life in any given century, say, but several, so as to gain that much more experience in a variety of roles involving different ages, nationalities and languages, sexual orientations, family roles, and so forth. [...]

[...] They exist apart from the physical world and in an inner one, and from this you draw those theories, ideas, civilizations, and technologies which you then physically translate.

(9:00.) As Ruburt himself often mentioned in his own book, The God of Jane, you should never accept as fact a theory that contradicts (underlined) your own experience. [...]

[...] At rest, Peg said that the above ideas fit into a pet theory of her own. [...]

[...] It is much easier if your theories fit reality, but if they do not, then you do not change reality one iota. [...]

[...] Many theories have been advanced to explain the leveling of over 20 square miles of forest, with this one being the latest. [...]

[...] Therefore they are more apt to combine reason and emotion, intuitions and intellect, and in so doing invent theories that reconcile previous contradictions. [...]

[...] You read a theory to the effect that cells ejected signals as they died.

I have told you that you create your dreams, in actuality, not in theory alone. [...]

[...] You succeed in cutting off, in theory, one portion of the self from the whole self.

[...] An idea is hardly a closed system, but the reality of an idea, its growth and potential, comes much closer to a description of the characteristics of the universe than any current theory.