“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Any discussion of this in our books is strictly my own doing, my own speculation: I think it fun to play creatively with a theory that is, after all, there for anyone to consider, from whatever standpoint. [...]

[...] (She would terrify the young Jane by stuffing cotton in her mouth and pretending she’d committed suicide, for example.) Jane also spent time in a strictly run Catholic orphanage. [...]

[...] You will compare your own life and work often in a critical fashion to artists who were obsessed with one art from the beginning of their lives, or who pursued what is really a kind of straight and undeviating course—a brave courageous one, perhaps, and highly focused, but one that must be in certain respects (underlined) limited in scope and complexity, not crossing any barriers except those that seem to occur strictly within painting’s realm itself (all intently. [...]

The more narrow and strict your conceptions of the good become, the larger and more threatening the “powers of evil” seem to grow.

In other words, portions of the inner self have joined the strictly egotistical functions. [...]

[...] Jane said this is good data, in that the Jewish Community Center is a sufficiently religious organization, and so quite conscious about the celebration of Christmas, etc., being strict about how this is done. [...]

From my standpoint some limited sessions, with strictly selected witnesses, are perfectly acceptable. [...]

[...] For this reason, in any projections you may be startled, for here you also enter a less strictly camouflaged situation.

If you deny yourself the direct experience of your own emotions, but muffle them, say, through too-strict discipline, then you can hurt others much more easily, for you project your deadened emotional state upon them—as in the Nazi war camps [men] followed orders, torturing other people—and you do that first of all by deadening your own sensitivity to pain, and by repressing your emotions.

[...] Was the monk Nebene—me when I was a very strict teacher of the children of rich Romans in first-century A.D. Italy? [...]

[...] You will be more adventurous or inventive perhaps at this time, but the strict emotional attitude remains the same. [...]

[...] During what is called the sexually active time; the larger dimensions of personhood become strictly narrowed into sexually stereotyped roles — and all aspects of identity that do not fit are ignored or denied. [...]

[...] (Pause.) There was an impatience however to have the works executed by others, in strict accordance to the original plans. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) Those who follow with great strictness the dictates of either science or religion can switch sides in a moment. [...]

[...] But in the face of that kind of exaggerated threat they were considered very strict, but reasonable enough under the conditions. [...]

[...] Even if, as we thought likely, all was not strictly honest on the medium’s part.

(10:02 to 10:20.) There are also realities (pause), that are “relatively more valid” than your own; in comparison, strictly for an analogy, for example, your physical table would appear as shadowy in contrast, as [like] those very shadowy tables we imagine. [...]

(Long pause in an intent delivery.) The entire idea of evolution, of course, requires strict adherence to the concept of continuing time, and the changes that time brings, and such concepts can at best provide the most surface kind of explanation for the existence of your species or any other.

[...] Earlier, spending money on anything not strictly necessary was bad, because it might detract from money needed to allow you to work. [...]

The human personality is therefore endowed sexually and psychologically with a freedom from strict sexual orientation. [...]

In actuality, following the image through, and strictly as an analogy, there would also be an infinite number of threads, both above and below your own, all part of one inconceivably miraculous webwork. [...]

A nation which pursues this course is like one individual who primarily follows a strictly “objective, male,” externally oriented path in terms of your Western understanding. [...]