1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:289 AND stemmed:project)

TES7 Session 289 September 28, 1966 13/58 (22%) caffeine projection Bernard intensities emotional
– The Early Sessions: Book 7 of The Seth Material
– © 2014 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 289 September 28, 1966 9 PM Wednesday

[... 18 paragraphs ...]

The episode did involve projection, mainly through intensities. These intensities you interpret as time and space. Now in a different kind of projection, you could face for example the girl’s thought forms as a pseudophysical reality.

If Ruburt had done the same thing from the dream state, this could have resulted. A very slight amount of physical weight was lost on Ruburt’s part. This will always occur when any kind of projection is experienced. Much of your intimate existence implies projections of various kinds. Thoughts are indeed small projections of yourself, sent outward.

You have yet to experience a complete projection, but this will come. Your fear, Joseph, in the window dream projection, shows that you are proceeding with great caution here.

(See my dream notebook for the very vivid dream-projection experience of August 20,1966.)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The conflict itself, you see, results in energy. Your dream projection at the window signaled that you did not want to go further at that particular point. You are afraid of emotional demonstrations, as you know. At the same time the withheld emotional energy acts as a propellant, you see.

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

In some ways this is unfortunate. Much of my emotional energy is used to give you this material, you see. It is behind the material. It forms intensities upon which I can build. Without this reaching out to you the material could not be delivered. When you are more proficient, we may be able to meet in some of your projections, but not for some time.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

There is an interesting similarity—and this is the last I will say—between last Friday’s episode and the ways in which the dream is basically constructed—the same emotional basis and projection, the same sort of symbolism. (One minute pause.)

I mentioned the caffeine. I should also note that if coffee does not prevent or inhibit sleep, it will stimulate dream projections, and also aid you in bringing the critical faculties into the dream state. If the body can achieve a deep state of relaxation, unbothered by the caffeine, then the caffeine does activate the reasoning processes; and sufficiently enough to help them operate for a while, while the body is in slumber. Alcohol will not help in this particular case.

If you are awakened for any reason during the night, the chances for a conscious projection on your return to sleep are somewhat higher than they would have been had your sleep not been interrupted.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(“Did I refuse to project in that dream?”

(See my dream of September 17 in my dream notebook. Jane and I had discussed this before the session. The setting of the dream was the same—my studio—as the dream of August 20, mentioned on page 69. In the first dream I had found myself outside the studio windows, but not falling. In the second dream I had refused to leave the safety of the studio, which is on the second floor, for fear of falling. It seemed to me to be a clear refusal to project.)

In that dream, and in several others which you have forgotten. This is for the best however. No projection should occur until you are ready, or when you are ready. The dream itself showed your attitude, and you have already begun to change it.

Even in the dream state, do not try to force yourself to project. You distrust the spontaneous nature, you see, that is at the base of all existence, but you only mistrust it at one level, which is fortunate. It is a learned reaction.

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 131 February 10, 1965 electrical density denseness intensities field
TES7 Session 290 October 3, 1966 Wendell tunnel studio reunion Crowley
TES7 Session 297 October 26, 1966 Topper journey anticipatory Bernard fear
TES3 Session 136 March 1, 1965 duplicate identical electrical sender transmitted