“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Ida was afraid to see the psychologist again, for fear that therapy would throw up evidence of this feared evil thing, and Dick is afraid of writing poetry again lest the intuitions upset his life. [...]

[...] I also described our encounters with psychologists and parapsychologists, as we tried to understand our experiences and place them within the context of normal life. [...]

[...] After referring to him cautiously as “a personality,” I feel bound to add that Seth is an astute philosopher and psychologist, deeply knowledgeable in the ways of human personality, and well aware of the triumph and plight of human consciousness.

[...] Ruburt recognizes it now, and he is no scientist or psychologist. [...]

[...] Directly, so to speak, beneath this personal material in the subconscious, is racial material which could be of great value to psychologists in their study of racial histories, and resulting psychological differences of the various races. [...]

(Half humorously:) Your psychologist should have told you that. [...]

You can see this easily for yourself if you consider the way in which psychologists use the terms “ego,” “subconscious,” and even “unconscious.” [...]

Do not place the words of gurus, ministers, priests, scientists, psychologists, friends — or my words — higher than the feelings of your own being. [...]

[...] You may rest assured that I will hold my own with your psychologists. [...]

(Friday evening Jane and I were visited by a psychologist [Ed Ostrander] from Cornell, after an exchange of letters over a period of several months. [...]

[...] Recently we received an excellent, rather lengthy paper about our work in which the writer, a psychologist, discussed among other things the import of Seth’s material, as well as various explanations of his origin. [...]

[...] (Eyes narrowed and dark.) They are not as nicely nor as neatly packaged out, one to a body, as your psychologists believe. [...]

[...] It did little good in the past for Freudian psychologists to listen to a person’s associations (pause) while maintaining an objective air, or pretending that values did not exist. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) The affair with the school psychologist, and the class here, infuriated him, and he hid his reaction. [...]

It is only lately that your psychologists have even begun to understand the connection between biology and personality, and they understand it in only the most simple of terms.

[...] These are the ones that should be understood and encouraged, say, by the psychologists.

[...] If such past memories are consciously recovered, as they have been, the closed mind of the academic psychologist will not see what he has, but will suppose the overworked imagination responsible. [...]

After making those points, however, I note with some amusement that I find it difficult indeed to believe that many millions of people must wait for a handful of their “superior” peers — philosophers, scientists, psychologists, parapsychologists — to tell them it’s all right to believe in at least a few of the inner abilities that each of us possesses, to whatever degree. [...]

And any work that is done, is done with Ruburt’s consent, and our friend got his back up quite well after working for two years with psychologists. [...]

[...] Dr. Instream always assured us of his continuing interest, told us to go on with the tests, and said that he had no evidence yet strong enough to “convince the hard-nosed psychologist.” [...]

[...] But now my idea of great defiance was to miss a session, to go out and get a beer and let the psychologist go stare at his old vase or ink spot or whatever he’d chosen for that night’s test.

[...] To show that although there are many psychologists with degrees seemingly in the same category as you are, that you are, nevertheless, beyond them. [...]

[...] However, they may be psychics, social workers, psychologists, artists, or in the religions. [...]