“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“Probably not.”)

(In addition, Seth has given enough information upon these visions so that I thought I had probably distorted quite valid and alien data into a form I could understand.

[...] A proportion of these will be discussed along with the nature of time, since some of these are connected with probabilities that could have occurred within your physical system.

We run into difficulties, for I do not speak of denseness as you probably think of it. [...]

[...] We shall in probability continue it in other existences. [...]

[...] Your desire to paint, per se, did not emerge full blown when you were a young man, and one probable self is happily engaged in commercial artwork. [...]

Living each day at a time, you respond to the present, and you need not in one day protect yourself from a lifetime of projected distractions or threats to your time that must, in your day, be imaginary, since they are probable events from the future.

[...] I mentioned that the question had probably touched upon hidden defenses, fears that the “protection” furnished by the eye condition would be taken away, and she agreed.

You said earlier yourself that you probably hardly realized how your own viewpoint has altered. [...]

The crisis would have occurred according to the circumstances and a variety of probabilities, but many of these led in that direction, you see.

[...] Then Jane dictated the words quoted above, saying Seth would probably cover them in tonight’s session. [...]

(Perhaps I put this appendix together as I did partly because Jane herself isn’t much turned on by reincarnational concepts, although she does like the way Seth insists upon the unlimited attributes of each personality; and within such a “simultaneous” framework there’s plenty of room for probable selves, reincarnational selves, and [added later] counterpart selves.²

[...] He is now a personality that was one of the probable personalities¹⁴ into which Seth could grow. [...]

7. For some related material on patterns and probabilities, see Note 13 for Appendix 12.

14. Seth discussed many facets of his concept of probabilities in Volume 1, of course. [...]

[...] All evening however, since writing the letter used as object, I had pictured a certain medical building in our neighborhood as probably the site of Dr. Lodico’s office. [...]

[...] His sign is fastened to the wall of the house beside an office door, beneath a porch roof, and would not be readable, probably, from a passing car.

[...] I felt that mankind seemed to have deliberately or perversely chosen to ignore it, for probably innumerable reasons historically. [...]

(Seth was going into the relationship between predictions and probabilities when the session came to an end because of the mentioned interruption. [...]

[...] In all probability, however, someone who was that publicly attuned would not be able to have our own kind of sessions to begin with, for the mixture of abilities would be of a different sort. [...]

[...] He was a religious teacher and philosopher who lived in India, probably from 563 to 483 B.C.

[...] I call that feeling, that awareness, a pale indication of what Seth means with his theory of probable realities—for like probable personalities, the unspoken channels he has available are certainly real whether or not they’re actualized in our physical reality.

[...] But obviously, if Seth did take up every moment of our temporal lives with personal material, all else would be probable.”

(Long pause at 9:44.) It is probably almost impossible for man to see that he forms the idea of historical context through his own associations and focuses. [...]

[...] Seth, I thought, would say that my father chose all the circumstances of his life, and that such a deprivation in old age was a probable result that materialized physically. [...]

(9:05.) The particular group of young doctors I saw, the specialists, were probably the fanciest-looking dandies that Elmira has known. [...]