“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It occurred to me that perhaps you did not know the importance of the material, or found it difficult to pick out its most distinguishing and valuable points.

(Jane smiled, then paused at this point. [...]

(Jane, one foot on a chair, pointed emphatically at me. [...]

[...] While I have Ruburt in such an excellent state of passivity, I will add another point that he has blocked in the past.

(9:15.) The dream made its point, whether or not you read the article that later appeared (in the Elmira paper). The dream made its point, in fact, whether or not you remembered it, though you did. [...]

You are also somewhat idealizing the past, however, so you did not simply get the information “straight on,” but you received it in such a fashion that it made its own psychological points also, and was furthermore wound into other action not only within that dream, but in a series of dreams.

[...] It collects evidence, then, to prove its point, because the rational mind, as you understand it, must have an acceptable reason for everything (underlined) (all intently).

You change your focus point. [...]

[...] Instead moment points are experienced fully, developments opening simultaneously, and “events” are recognized as psychic and psychological happenings not necessarily connected with any exterior circumstance.

For our friend here (Jane pointed to Emolene), an existence in the land called Greece before it had that name. [...]

Here I am merely using your terms to make the point. [...]

An individual, and I am speaking in your terms now, again to make a point: an individual is the 60 or 70-odd years of his earthly existence, as much as he is the 150-odd pounds that he may be.

[...] The emotional, responses then are used as departure points for other experiences. [...]

The point is that I am not impersonal any more than you are, in those terms, and the Sumari in those terms are also individual and to that extent personal. [...]

[...] There are some further points however I want to make, and I will try to make them briefly.

It is all there is black and white, including suggestions in the sexual area, why it would be advantageous, the various emotional points of resistance that would appear during such encounters, and their significance, and much more.

[...] After a point his stubbornness was aroused, and he felt that you wanted him to beg for what should be his. [...]

There are definite points—and check the old sessions—where emotional resistances will be reached and he will want to cry during the sexual encounter. [...]

[...] Whenever she dictated an answer to me, or part of one, it is noted in the text of the answer at the exact point dictation began. [...]

(Jane did remember it, beginning with the word superego, but she was receiving the answer very quickly at that point; also she thought she might be consciously tinkering with the message by using such a word as superego.

[...] I will try to think of a good analogy to make this point clearer later. [...]

A disease of course is not brought about at any particular point in time, but is latent, and merely becomes perceivable enough to cause danger at what approximates a particular point in time. [...]

This does not mean that the individual will necessarily fall ill to many of them, but it does mean that the physical structure has weak points that reflect, or are a result of, an inability along the lines of physical construction, that in turn result from an imperfection in manipulation.

Inner pockets of fear hold back needed energy, creating these weak points in the physical body. [...]

[...] I will make a point to inquire about this in the next session.)

I want, therefore, to reinforce certain points. [...]

[...] I also want, however, to gently introduce another framework, that I want you to use simply as a point of higher reference for now.

[...] Now I would like the truth of this higher framework at least to affect the framework in which you are now operating in this other framework, and I will have to use your points of reference (with almost a laugh.)

[...] There, you are so confident of the truth that your beliefs form reality that you need not check the body at every point to see how it is reacting, for you know it will respond as completely to the new suggestions as it did to the old, even though you recognize that practically speaking some time might be involved in Framework 2’s time.

(By now I had learned that she could speak under hypnosis without difficulty, a point we had wondered about to at least some extent. [...]

[...] We did not reach this point however.

[...] Yet it was now apparent that Jane felt a sense of blame, even shame; at the start of the deeper trance state she told me she felt I was mad at her all the time because I had worked full time at Artistic, etc; I tried to counter this by pointing out to her the benefits we had both obtained from this.

(Two additional points now recalled: When she began talking about Florida, Jane told me “I got scared in Florida”; she was also sure I would leave her when the job situation got so bad and things didn’t work out as we’d hoped they would. [...]

[...] One further point. [...]

[...] This is a point aside, yet an important one: Food is indeed sacred. [...]

[...] An oval shape, or eye shape—that is, this kind of an eye, you see (her eyes closed, Jane pointed to one of her own) inside of a rectangle or triangle.

[...] These three points can all be included in the “dark coloring” category, and blue is given specifically by Seth.

One of the other men mentioned has a mustache, a dark one, though he is not necessarily a young man, and pointed features. The chin small but pointed.(Jane touched her own chin.)

There are a few points I would like to make. [...]

[...] Jane and I made most of the connections between the envelope object and the data easily enough, and did not ask Seth to clear up any points. [...]

[...] We think this is a reference to part of the technique in reading a hand; as described in the book it is not only necessary to consider the lines, but the “mounts”, which are the high points of flesh at the base of the fingers, the thumb, the heel of the hand, etc. [...]

[...] Jane called B.T. the next day and was given verification of some points by B.T. over the phone. Betty would like a copy of the data to study some of the other points. [...]

[...] During the call she verified several of Seth’s points made during the 497th session. [...]

[...] Better in fact than usual, and he, at least, will consider it one of the high points of his career.

[...] Other points in this data either checked out or were close, according to BT, but aren’t listed here separately. [...]

[...] Probabilities always operate, and yet within that framework the large proportion and the points I have made will come to pass. Now you must deduct some points here and there for distortion, but the overall still applies. [...]

[...] We will go into this more deeply, for you can indeed rid yourself of the symptoms, but I would like to make one point here first. [...]

[...] One point: the drug you are now taking over a period of time would not be recommended by me—

[...] You would think: “If I could move freely, then I could solve all problems,” when the true point is: when you feel free to solve the problems, there will be no physical symptoms to worry about.

[...] I must emphasize that I am not saying that the soul or entity is a computer, but only asking you to look at the matter in this light in order to make several points clear.

(During break Jane got a brief but clear message from Seth: We should turn our bed back so that its head pointed north again, instead of to the west as it does now.

[...] Our experience at this point includes our work in each. [...]

[...] A certain leeway is always left for spontaneity and surprises, so that anything in your experience can be used as an example or as a point about which I can build a discussion that I had already intended in any case.

[...] You should be able to go with him, and from his vantage point observe your own reality and situation, to see you and Ruburt and your lives for yourself from this different vantage point. [...]

This other portion of yourself will also view his reality from your vantage point, and your ideas will stimulate his own, and both of you will gain from the encounter. [...]

[...] He should be able to take you there in a projection, and from that point you should be able to look down into your own system, and in a series of flashes to see your life and Ruburt’s with greater clarity. [...]

The beginning of our sessions represented one such point. The initiation of our other personality represented a second point. [...] The third such point will find your individual activities heightened; spontaneous visions and occurrences for example on your part; generally better projections on Ruburt’s part, and heightened psy-time periods for you both. [...]

[...] Each dream will mark a point of advance.

[...] I have to get him (pointing to me) when I can get him, if I want to get my book done.

[...] Others choose instead to take the form they had at the particular point when the greatest mental or emotional heights were achieved, regardless of the beauty or age that characterized the form. [...]

(As Seth, Jane pointed to John Barclay, sitting beside me on the couch. [...]

[...] (Jane, as Seth, pointed to John. [...]

There are inner meeting places, then, interior “places” that serve as points of inner commerce and communication. [...] This will be elaborated upon later in the book.³ Our dream-art scientist learns to recognize such points of correlation.

[...] It has taken you centuries to reach your point of technological achievement. [...]

2. Since from this point Seth uses the masculine pronouns “he” and “him” while discussing representatives of the race, I refer the reader to Note 5 for Session 696, in Section 3.

[...] It is obvious that other gestalt personalities experience more in an equivalent amount of your time, but this is not the point.

The point is that as something that comes and goes and passes, that brings into existence and destroys, has no such reality outside of your own system. [...]

[...] As far as your own system is concerned, I have told you that the past ever changes, and here we enter the realm of probabilities; for at any point in any man’s life, where a decision was made, the other probable alternative actions were also taken.

Our friend the artist (Van Elver; see the data last session regarding sepia) is not available this evening, but if you make the point of reminding me before sessions, I will see that we get more information for you.

The point that I wanted to make is that in all instances energy, individualized energy, materializes itself on any, or within any, field through mental enclosures; which are of themselves not formed of any camouflage, but represent entry points formed of pure energy for its entrance and eventual manipulation within a given field.

[...] I had planned to give you tonight completely free, but I want to make a few points first.