“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] An understandable-enough resolution, I said, and one I couldn’t argue with basically, since such a course could logically be the one chosen by some personalities—but it was also one that I didn’t choose at this time. [...]

[...] The connections between us, now, are far more logical than any simple cause and effect.

Now: remember that while your dreams occur one night at a time, their logic is timeless. [...]

[...] Yet this inner self, this inner vitality, is one of the main clues which man refuses to recognize, calling it an unreasonable assumption, but not willing to examine it for those characteristics which show it to be the most reasonable and logical of phenomena.

In the time those fears originated, he shared the belief framework of Christianity, so that he believed that outside of that framework there could indeed be nothing but chaos, or the conventional atheism of science, in which the universe was at the mercy of meaningless mechanistic laws—laws, however, that operated without logic, but more importantly laws that operated without feeling. [...]

[...] His mind is logical rather than intuitive. [...]

[...] The inner logic is much more consistent within the dream universe, and action is permitted greater freedom in several important respects.

True organization is not logical in any case.

[...] The whole affair was psychically logical, and followed inner patterns that aided all of you.

[...] Thus, the position of the roller pan is interpreted literally by Seth as being under a roof—quite a logical position. [...]

In such a situation all enthusiasm becomes taboo, unrealistic, and only fear is realistic or logical. [...]

[...] They are endowed with a readiness to listen, for one thing, and with a helpful faculty for suspending camouflage logical thinking. [...]

Ruburt is strongly intuitive, but basically in this life relies upon your logic and strength, and you have a good degree of both. [...]

[...] I granted that one could always say that the same end couldn’t be achieved by not going as far, but then, I told Jane, if one followed that line of reasoning to its logical conclusion, physical death would result — that state would be the final extreme of any form of behavior.

[...] Your intellect as you think of it operates so clearly and precisely, so logically (with amusement), sometimes so arrogantly, because the intellect rides that great thrust of codified, “ancient,” “unconscious” power—the power of instant knowing that is a characteristic of the body consciousness (all very intently).

[...] There is a structure within the Sumari language, but it is not one based upon logic. [...]

[...] They seem logical only in their relationship to a core idea. [...]

[...] And upon these, again, the logical framework of the work will rest.

(9:33.) Man’s reasoning mind, however, with its fascinating capacity for logic and deduction, and for observation, rests upon (pause) a direct cognition—a direct cognition that powers his thoughts, that makes thinking itself possible. [...]

The connections among such associations cannot be followed from the standpoint of intellectual logic, for those associations are first of all emotional. [...]

(Pause at 9:42.) Since you do not perceive the future and do not understand that life goes out in all directions, then it seems only logical to suppose that present forms must be based upon past ones. [...]

[...] Logically enough, then, in the dictionary one of the synonyms for hallucination will be a word like “delusion”: a belief not true, a persistent opinion without corresponding physical evidence.