“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] If you trusted the characteristics of the basic natural person, you would not need such sessions as ours, generally, in the world at all—for such knowledge would be part of it and implied in its cultural organizations, and the daily habits of the people. [...]

[...] Yet the feeling is the result of the natural person’s knowledge of the symbolic nature both of objects and thoughts, and of the rhythmic patterns that both follow, so that, again, on such occasions such activities do trigger new unconscious activity and set up new patterns of organization. [...]

[...] When you leave this dimension, then you concentrate upon the knowledge that you have gained. [...]

[...] If you are wise, you take time to digest your knowledge and to plan your next life even, you see, as a writer plans a next book. [...]

[...] Spontaneity has its own discipline and its own knowledge, and when you attempt to rule spontaneity with a heavy hand, then rigidity enters in and you destroy the fountain of inner knowledge and intuition and understanding and you distort the emotions that you have. [...]

[...] The EE units, impressing a probable physical field, contain within them the latent knowledge of all of the various species that can emerge under those conditions. [...]

[...] You chose “this” probable reality in order to ask certain questions about the nature of man — seeing him where he wavered equally between creativity and destruction, knowledge and ignorance; but a point that contained potentials for the most auspicious kinds of development, in your eyes. [...]

[...] You take it for granted as a rule that your current knowledge as a people rests upon scientific data, at least, that is unassailable. [...]

In those terms, then, Christianity and your other religions are myths, rising in response to an inner knowledge that is too vast to be clothed by facts alone. [...]

A psychological existence presupposes experience, experience in terms of value fulfillment (pause) and the emotional manipulation and direct knowledge of subjective states. [...]

I am able to change them as action while retaining the knowledge that I am that which changes, and find my stability in change. [...]

[...] This presupposes inner knowledge and calculations, for you must be aware of the probabilities in order to choose from them. The inner self therefore has and uses this knowledge. [...]

[...] And told you that knowledge must be directly experienced. [...]

[...] Your brothers knew this, the priests, and they used this knowledge to incite you to act as a spy for them. [...]

Now I am going to say good evening shortly but remember you call this your universe and your reality and it is indeed, for you form it, and yet within you is also the knowledge of other great experiments that are being tried. [...]

[...] We’d been discussing current population problems when Seth came through to tell us that in the fourth century, infanticide — at least to his knowledge — had been quite common. [...]

[...] Yet any individual knows quite well that intuitive hunches, inspiration, precognitive information or clairvoyant material has often risen to conscious knowledge. [...]

[...] Yet there is nothing basically inaccessible about such “inner knowledge or experience.” [...]

[...] There are also great failures — but these are failures only in comparison with the glittering inner knowledge of the imagination that holds for you those ideals against which you judge your acts.

At the same time, Jane and I checked a number of biblical references on the New Testament — and discovered that Seth’s passage seems to be a case where he shows a knowledge we don’t consciously possess. [...]

I’d say that in this 829th session Seth spoke out of a knowledge of biblical tradition and history; that is, he wasn’t saying that Christ did rise from the dead or ascend into heaven, but referring to Christianity’s interpretation of its own creative Christ story. [...]

[...] They become, with full inner knowledge, vessels, or rather channels through which the poison can be to some extent ejected. [...]

[...] With all of this and his knowledge and acceptance of his role, and his choice of the role, there is still a tremendous will on other levels to survive within your system. [...]

[...] Possibly some knowledge on the part of the Jews, not specific maybe, but suspected, that this would happen, and a political realization of its consequences—beneficial to the Jews, that prevented warnings. [...]

[...] You can use such knowledge often, so that such changes stand for their symbolic inner alterations.

[...] (Suddenly very intense and fast:) At other levels of psychic activity however such knowledge is also available to you, but only when you disconnect your experience from the time-activated neuronal structure — and this you can do through various alterations of consciousness, often quite spontaneously adopted.

[...] Now beneath your usual consciousness, your physical organism can react to future events without your knowledge, as it can to past ones. [...]

[...] In that way, you become familiar with certain knowledge from a variety of viewpoints.

[...] Your imaginations have always helped you form your civilizations, your arts and your sciences, and when they are united with your reasoning processes they can bring you knowledge about the universe and your places in it that you can receive in no other fashion.

Your beliefs in the possibility of such knowledge makes such knowledge accessible.

[...] The knowledge, hard won, would be as instinct when the race began again. [...]

[...] For this reason the inner self withholds much of its knowledge. [...]

[...] Within the earthly cycle, such knowledge is not transmitted to the physical brain, but it is always known.

[...] Since many of the building plans involved the construction of various kinds of temples, the personality has always been interested in acquiring knowledge concerning the nature of reality. [...]

(Jane and I have met Joanie a few times before, without any knowledge of her lettuce-eating habit, and can attest that Seth’s data here was as much a surprise to us as to Joanie or Bill. [...]

[...] The light will lead you into knowledge that you would not have known otherwise, nor would you have sought it as vigorously.

(To Dave:) Now, he had a mathematical knowledge, and you also have this whether or not you realize it. [...]

[...] You are to rely upon the inner knowledge that he has intuitively made clear to you. [...]

[...] Yet all sciences are based on the desire for knowledge, and so there are intersections that occur even in the most diverse of paths; and you are at such an intersection.

The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. [...]

[...] Until you perceive the innate consciousness behind any “visible” or “invisible” manifestations, then, you put a definite barrier to your own knowledge.