“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

To study the human body from only the physical standpoint, or to consider it as exclusively a physical phenomenon, is to severely limit your perception of it, and of reality as a whole. [...]

[...] To the human being it must appear that telepathy is a mental or psychic communication occurring between two or more entirely separate selves. [...]

[...] To attain that end, Hitler was quite willing to sacrifice the rest of humanity. [...]

[...] Some people believe that homosexuals and lesbians are “evil,” that somehow they lack the true qualities of humanness [and therefore need not be treated with normal respect]. [...]

[...] Since 1925 scientists have been steadily reducing their estimates of what a “safe” dose for human beings really is, however, and many now believe that there’s no such thing as a completely harmless amount of even low-level radiation. [...]

Group dreaming was at one time taken for granted as a natural human characteristic—in a tribe, for example, when new locations were being sought, perhaps in time of drought. [...]

[...] I reminded Jane that some time ago Seth had remarked that as physical creatures we human beings cannot bear to directly confront the basic, vast, unimaginably awesome and creative consciousness of All That Is. [...]

The multiplicity of human experience would be impossible were it not for the inner self, and for the heritage that speaks through the cells of every human being. The perspectives and psychic relationships that make up the human personality simply could not have resulted through action within your field alone. [...]

Dr. Instream understands, I am sure, that we are not only involved here with inner perceptions, and with translations that must be made as data is given by me to Ruburt, but we are also working within human limitations, and of course with human potentialities.

The reality of such intuitive thoughts as electromagnetic actions has not been understood, and is quite vital to any comprehension of the human system. [...]

As human beings we live suspended between life and death. [...]

Among other things, Seth Two said: “The human race is a stage through which various forms of consciousness travel. [...]

“When you leave the physical system after reincarnations, you have learned the lessons—and you are literally no longer a member of the human race, for you elect to leave it. [...]

“Humanity dreams the same dream at once, and you have your mass world. [...]

[...] Each being is an individualized segment of the universe; then, in human terms, each person is a beloved individual, formed with infinite care and love, uniquely gifted with a life like no other.

[...] She scored some remarkable “hits” psychically and made some errors — yet she ended up thinking that her demonstrated abilities often collided with what our society teaches us is possible in human activity. [...]

[...] Therefore your tree recognizes a human being, though it does not see the human being in your terms. [...]

[...] The state of consciousness involved here is dull as compared to the highly differentiated human ability in many ways.

A tree knows a human being also. [...]

[...] As your body senses temperature changes so it also senses the psychic charge not only of other human beings but also, believe it or not, of animals, and to a lesser extent it senses the psychic charge of plants and vegetative matter. [...]

[...] But to him, nature did not include his fellow human beings. The solitariness that besieged him — because it did besiege him — is dangerous to any personality unless it comes after identification with the human race.

That is, in his feeling of unity with All That Is, he excluded other human beings, and on your plane it is necessary for the personality to relate to its fellows. [...]

[...] Physically the human fetus bears a memory of its “past.”¹ In your terms, it travels through the stages of evolution before attaining its human form. [...]

“A tree knows human beings also … by the vibrations in the air as they pass, which hit the tree’s trunk from varying distances, and even by such things as voices. [...]

[...] I believe you had an image of the inside portion of a human body, or a thought having to do with inner organs. [...]

[...] As an artist painting human figures, I am often concerned with anatomy, though usually of the head and features. [...]

[...] To relieve the symptoms is indeed pleasant, and human, and understandable. [...]

[...] And the familiarity and the very human characteristics by which you know me are mine, but they are only a small portion of my identity. [...]

[...] One piece had been written by a brain “researcher” who, we thought, exhibited remarkably little understanding of the human condition. [...]

[...] I said more in a similar vein, while all the time a basic part of me knew that I was oversimplifying the human condition by far.

[...] and speaking engagements, etc., would limit it to specifically to human problems.... [...]

[...] Psychological reality, emotional reality, and the reality of thought also become valid to human personality through their existence as various intensities. [...]

The mind then formulates meaningful psychological symbols, but still in terms of electric symbol, and only in the brain are the particular symbols then sent to the various levels of the human personality.

Sense images are built up, you see, in the same manner whether or not you are trying to perceive an apple, a star, or a human being. [...]

These help form the reality of human conditions upon your planet at any given time. [...]

[...] The same relationships, however, do not only exist between human bodies, of course, but between man and the animals and the plants in the environment, and is part of the unending biological communication that overall produces the vitality of physical experience.

[...] I would like to make clear, of course, that animals certainly do have energy to maintain their own health, but this is strongly reinforced as a rule by the vitality of human beings to whom the animals are emotionally attached. [...]

[...] Individually and en masse, and to the extent that our human systems of perception make it possible, our species has created a world and universe built upon a very limited, repetitious creation and interpretation of internal and external data. [...]

[...] As far as I know, we humans are the only ones to indulge in such behavior. [...]

[...] They might seem limited to you, yet they combined animal and human characteristics beautifully, and they used tools quite well. [...]

[...] They did not need long periods of protection as infants, but in an animal fashion were physically more agile at younger ages than, say, the human infant.