“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

From the point of view of the perceiver these would be unofficial events, and yet they could serve as important clues to the nature of reality. [...] From your point of view you could not pick up the grocer’s escapades and the symphony, for instance, if both came through at 8 o’clock in the evening, without switching from one to the other: You would have to choose which program you wanted.

[...] Through Ruburt, then, I am permitted to view the earth “again” in your terms. [...]

I have said that if five people seemed to view this glass, then what you would have in actuality would be five individual physical glasses. As you and Ruburt and Mark view this glass, each of you see a different glass.

(We found the front door locked and bolted, then spent a few minutes looking around the front half of the place, and admiring the view. [...]

(We were discussing the evening’s material when I happened to remark that it seemed as though a performer on television, for example, when viewed by others, might be created by millions of viewers, many of whom would be independent of each other as far as our conception of distance is concerned; yet all the images so created would overlap enough to be identifiable as the one performer.

Any compromise of principle on Philip’s part will be interpreted not as compromise, but as weakness, and will work against the respect with which they now view him.

We will let the demented bit pass for now, but this represents a failure on your part, and a somewhat smug attitude of hiding what is best from view. [...]

In your terms I see not only greater chunks of time than you do, but I can to some considerable extent view the probable actualizations of events and times.

[...] According to Seth’s views, such encounters with other portions of their whole selves would be inevitable.

[...] It is of a view I scouted from our motel window. [...]

(“And a look out” is interesting to us, because I spent some time for a couple of days looking out our back motel room window, studying this particular view before finally taking a picture of it. [...]

[...] I described my experience viewing the paintings to her, and made a mental note to bring the painting in to 330 so she can see it, since her recall of it isn’t too clear. [...]

[...] For weeks after her admittance in April, I didn’t know if Jane would ever do any “psychic” work again, but three months later she surprised me by beginning a series of dialogues similar to the “world-view” material she’d produced for her books on the psychologist and philosopher William James, and the artist Paul Cézanne. [...]

[...] The inner knowledge of all of your lives, from your point of view, is in the same category as those automatic processes that underlie your existence.

[...] The idea, of course, is only to integrate the two often opposing points of view, instead of having them in conflict with each other, since, as Seth says, we always have some practical need of Framework 1 activity. [...]

[...] It would depend upon what terms one chose within which to view the situation.

[...] They are extensions of you from your point of view. [...]

[...] In view of his reply now, though, I didn’t pursue the matter further.

(Saturday, May 16, 5:00 PM: Possibly a dream: In a view from above I had a panoramic glimpse of the curving surface of a planet, something like the moon, covered with protuberances that seemed to be craters in reverse.

[...] I had many questions, ranging from the consciousnesses of the ants involved, and their right to life, as opposed to the “destructive” view taken of them by farmers, scientists, and so forth in the conventional sense. [...]

Your dream about the return to Sayre, and the more spacious surroundings, means also that as you now change the past and the future, so you have changed the past: you view it in a more extended light, so that it becomes less narrow and constricting. [...]

[...] They are even more entangled with scientific concepts, and with science’s views of life in general. [...]

[...] We are actually involved in changing a way of life, in altering our very view of the self and the world in the hopes of acquiring a new sense of harmony with our bodies, our minds, our fellow creatures, and the environment.

(The whole medical bit is turning into a farce, in our view. [...]

[...] Two days ago, she worked on our new front porch for the first time; she sat in the slanting sunlight and wrote down the information she psychically picked up from the “world view” of William James, the American psychologist and philosopher who lived from 1842–1910. [...] [In the note she’s making for her Introduction to Seth’s The Nature of the Psyche, Jane describes a world view as “…a living psychological picture of an individual life, with its knowledge and experience, which remains responsive and viable long after the physical life itself is over.”]

[...] This is precisely however the way the ego views the subconscious, as a rule. [...]

[...] Its location, in one corner of the place, is unique; it sits on a raised platform perhaps two feet higher than the other tables; the dance band is on the left, the fireplace on the right, with an excellent view of the dance floor in between. [...]

(For a while the couple then disappeared from view and we forgot about them. [...]