“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The known rules that govern the behavior of creatures and objects in dreams seem no longer to apply. [...]

[...] Actually more simply what was needed were personalities that were not fanatics along any line, including scientific fanatics who would object as much to the reincarnation data as forcibly as religious fanatics would object to some of the other material.

If small families kept track of their own family dreams, for example, they could discover unsuspected correlations and sense the interplay of subjective and objective drama with which they are always psychologically involved. [...]

[...] This development was an advancement, yet this advancement led also to a separation and objectifying of consciousness, into dual segments of subject and object.

(Front of the empty envelope used as the object in the 290th session, the 72nd experiment, for October 3, 1966.)

(Section of linen canvas practically identical with that used as object in the 84th envelope experiment in the 319th session for February 13,1967.)

Dreams involve a certain kind of inner motion, and in a manner of speaking, at least, exterior motions consist of dream activities also, and in a dream reality that everyone more or less agrees is a separate, objective world. [...]

What you want is not a perfection which is rigid, but the ever-balancing action of spontaneous motion, a balance precariously maintained for a moment through ever-approaching and receding imbalances that result in objects.

(As we talked Jane herself made the intuitive connection that her “intellectual skepticism” about her psychic gifts is really a fear, an emotional masquerade that prevents her from being really objective in considering her abilities. [...]

“The whole thing had been going on for some time before I finally woke up with my objections. [...]

(Copy of the drawing by me, used as the object in the 79th envelope experiment, in the 306th session for December 5,1966.)

[...] Make certain that your idea of success is not merely financial, or concerned overly with the acquisition of the material objects that you do not now have.

[...] The production of dreams is as “sophisticated” an endeavor as is the production of the objective life of a given individual. [...]

[...] Some of the information applied at first glance; other parts of it, I thought, were impressions attached to the test objects themselves, as in the 185th session.

[...] She couldn’t recall it clearly, but it featured her talking to a man, objecting to him that he’d told her something he’d given her would be painless—but that it was instead quite painful: a suicide pill, or something like that, she said. [...]

[...] We project ideas into an object, so that we can deal with it. But the object is the thought, materialized. [...]

(For the envelope test object I used the appointment card for Jane’s visit to the dentist last May 5,1965. [...]

I believe the object has to do with a locket that belongs to his wife, or that belonged to a female child.

[...] It will also require a certain objectivity, in that you must try to see your own universe then from the other side. [...]

[...] In our earlier discussions concerning the nature of matter, we made it plain that each individual created any given material object, through use of the inner senses, and following certain rules which were mentioned.

[...] Concentration upon one minute, limited, contracted object will result in consciousness expansion, for have I not said that within even the molecule and atom there exists capsule comprehension?