“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“I remember you said once that the inner senses weren’t as fluent.”

As fluent?

(“Yes. As fluent as the outer senses.”)

The word fluent is the word that bothers me, and I do not know to what you refer. I am not sure of your meaning of the word fluent in that particular context.

The word fluent simply does not strike me in that context.

(Break at 10:45. Jane was dissociated as usual. It developed that during the exchange with Seth Jane had thought I used the word fluid, instead of fluent. To me however the two words had the same implication in this instance.

—and this time we have no distortion but a simple mistake I believe in notes. I certainly did not say what I have just seen through Ruburt’s eyes. The error is in one word; not fluent but “inner.” The outer senses are not as fluent as the inner. For some reason the word was either mistaken or transposed, I do not know. The outer senses dealing with rigid camouflage patterns could not be as fluent as the inner senses.

This could lead to errors in the interpretation of the material itself. The outer senses are schooled to interpret data in rather narrow terms, and therefore are not fluent. I hope that this is cleared up, and anything else like it should be instantly brought to my attention as soon as you become aware of it.

Your particular conscious and subconscious viewpoints are fluent enough so that they do not hamper the basic material or cover it with the rock of dogmatism so that it becomes impossible to find.