“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It was supposed to be published in its entirety, but language difficulties led to the mixup. [...]

[...] It is a constant language, yet one that transforms itself. [...]

Telepathic communications go on continually beneath consciousness, and without the aid of telepathy and without the aid of the inner senses, language itself would be meaningless. The hidden cues are the symbols that make language intelligible. [...]

[...] The psychological mobility of consciousness, however, allows for an inner kind of communication impossible to verbalize, an interlocking spiritual and biological language by which experience is directly transmuted. [...]

1. In Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality Seth began developing his theory of counterparts — that the larger psychological self, or entity, of each of us manifests not just one physical life in any given century, say, but several, so as to gain that much more experience in a variety of roles involving different ages, nationalities and languages, sexual orientations, family roles, and so forth. [...]

[...] This he did do, though often approaching the same topic or impression in new language. [...]

[...] Seth does deal with some of the same impressions in both experiments, using different language each time, and this will be indicated where we think it occurred.

[...] In your language R, A, K, E, S (spelled); either Andrus or Andrew as the first name and a French background here also. [...]

[...] He puts his sciences and religions, his languages, together in multitudinous ways, but there must always be a translation of inner information outward to the world of sense. [...]

On the one hand, man did indeed feel that he had fallen from a high estate, because he remembered that earlier freedom of dream reality—a reality in which the other creatures were still to some degree (underlined) immersed.³ Man’s mind, incidentally, at that point had all the abilities that you now assign to it: the great capacity for contrast of imagination and intellect, the drive for objectivity and for subjectivity (softly), the full capacity for the development of language—a keen mind that was as brilliant in any caveman, say, as it is in any man on a modern street.

[...] It is difficult to put this into language. [...]

[...] The meaning, so to speak, must be separated and made meaningful to many psychological areas, some of which would not even seem to speak the same language.

[...] For that matter, in the terms of your language, and intellectual concepts, you will probably have to take it for granted that you cannot understand the nature of such a God.

[...] You would interpret these events as space and time, and so often I must use the terms, for I must use your language rather than my own.

By the time the painting is done you should almost be able to hear his words, even though they are in a language you do not know. [...]

[...] Behind the symbol of language is essence. [...]

[...] I do not want to involve you with an esoteric language that can be used to close others out as well as to unite you. [...]

[...] Now, he translated this into layers of voices, and various languages, and did not know how to translate or contain the information that was quite legitimately available. [...]

[...] Oftentimes body language is used in such cases, to state a situation, to communicate an attitude that is otherwise not clearly stated. [...]

This meant, of course, a language (pause) that was in its way more precise than your own, for concepts were routinely expressed that described the vast complexity of subjective as well as objective events. [...]

Language is practiced by infants in the dream state, and it is indeed that mental practice that results in children speaking sentences far more quickly than otherwise would seem possible. [...]

[...] He told her he’d been hospitalized several times for mental problems, and demonstrated his ability to speak very fluently a “nonsense” language he cannot decipher. [...]

(“I heard Bill Baker speak a very fluent—uh, foreign—language, one that he said he couldn’t decipher.”)

The language is an excellent example of the coded messages I mentioned earlier (as I’d thought). It is supposed to remain secret, you see, yet becomes the symbol of the all-powerful knowledge of the exaggerated superior self, while making the knowledge impossible to act upon. [...]