“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] So far we’d heard nothing from him about these, and I also looked forward to see how we were doing here. [...]

[...] It is his public image as a psychic, of course, not as a writer, that here is the issue. [...]

Animals also possess independent volition, and while I am emphasizing animals here, the same applies to any creature, large or small: insect, bird, fish, or worm; to plant life; to cells, atoms, or electrons. [...]

[...] It is, however, the subjective feeling that is the important clue here, and once you experience it there will be no doubt in your mind.

I hope you see what I have done here. [...]

[...] I will use him here as an example to some extent, to show how a bridge belief appeared to assimilate what seemed to be diametrically opposed ideas. [...]

[...] When I remarked that I tried not to worry about such things anymore, she replied that she too had better get back to book work and forget the world’s troubles: “Come on, Seth, I’m here.” [...]

Here in Dreams Seth uses the uncertainty principle as an analogy (and an excellent one), meaning that as the positions and motions of elementary particles, say, cannot be simultaneously measured precisely, so our genetic qualities and their motions can not always be specifically determined. [...]

Your black-and-white beliefs have often led you both to either expect scorn, misunderstanding, or on the other hand to expect too much of others who come here. [...]

Now let us return to Augustus; for here we find again in one individual an excellent example of the way in which seemingly nonphysical thoughts and beliefs can affect and alter the corporeal image. [...]

[...] Since the article is attached, we can pass up the details here. [...]

[...] The loving encouragement, again, is highly important, for here you must change habits, both of you, of conditioning. [...]

(In here, I had to laugh as Seth spoke. [...]

[...] Much of his material in that session applies here: “It is truer to say that heredity operates from the future backward into the past….”

As I wrote this note Jane pointed out that some of my material in Note 1 for the 803rd session is applicable here. [...]

(Seth did return at 11:35 with some information deleted here. [...]

[...] Jane’s delivery was often more forceful and emphatic than I’ve indicated here. [...]

[...] Nor need he feel at the beck and call of anyone who wants to come here for a session or otherwise.

[...] Newborn animals either die quickly and naturally, painlessly, before their consciousnesses are fully focused here, or are killed by their mothers — not because they are weak or unfit to survive, but because the [physical] conditions are not those that will produce the quality of life that makes survival “worthwhile.”

(I’ll insert here the note that we did see Bill Danaher about a will this morning.)