1 result for (heading:"135 februari 24 1965" AND stemmed:distanc)

TES3 Session 135 February 24, 1965 7/56 (12%) electrical distance intensities Callahan Mark
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– Session 135 February 24, 1965 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 15 paragraphs ...]

It should be easier now for you to understand this vitality, since we have already spoken in terms of reality existing by means of intensities. You will recall that I spoke of distances in terms of action, and that these distances occurred not in a perceivable framework of the sort with which you are familiar, but that I spoke of distance that had its reality in terms of the varying intensities within any given electrical actuality.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Therefore, traveling through such distance would involve travel through the electrical intensities that go into the existence of any given action as it electrically occurs. This idea of action within action, of distance and movement within action, is a fairly new one in our sessions.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

It is difficult here to do more than simply give you the statement. If you will, at your leisure, consider the makeup of your own dreams, you may partially and intuitively understand what I mean, for the distance in dreams is endless, though you may go but a little way; yet this distance as we have said, does not take up space. This comes close to evoking an understanding of distance as it occurs electrically, existing within an action.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

All depth, all dimension and all distance is therein contained within the electrical universe. There is here, as I have said, no such thing as size in your terms, or shape in your terms; but there is, again, distance, which is not absolute but varying, and which can be said to exist both backward and forward indefinitely within the infinite intensities. And all reality within any given field basically occurs within such intensities.

Once more, your own inner psychological experiences, and the inner life of every individual, can lead you to some understanding along these lines. Nor, as I said earlier, should this seem so strange. Mankind names and identifies even what he cannot see, and he divides and he separates. As I mentioned, when you look into a mirror you do not see your ego. You can never see it. You experience it directly, and so do you experience directly this sort of distance of which I speak.

But as you cannot find life by dissecting a frog, you cannot find this sort of distance by exploring space. When you dissect the frog you destroy that which you had been seeking. You are left with camouflage. Only by direct experience will anyone know of these matters.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Nor does Ruburt. He either goes overboard and overdoes, or does nothing in that respect, and I believe in other respects. The half-hour limit should always be maintained, however. You should be able to experience now, directly, the sort of distance to which I have referred.

[... 23 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 128 February 3, 1965 electrical intensity shape dissection field
TES3 Session 131 February 10, 1965 electrical density denseness intensities field
TES3 Session 125 January 25, 1965 electrical intensity distance Lee incense
TES3 Session 122 January 18, 1965 electrical field system force protrudes
TES4 Session 197 October 11, 1965 electromagnetic test Peggy dog identity