“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“A double exposure.” Either this is a reference to two, above, or possibly to the fact that my brother brought transparencies with him to show Jane and me. We don’t remember Loren referring to any double exposures in a literal sense.

Yellow. Two. A double exposure. Something that can be seen through. Something outmoded or old-fashioned. Do you have any questions?

(“How about the double exposure?”)

[...] As the books became more popular, you were suddenly threatened in terms of privacy, of exposure personally—and perhaps, Ruburt felt, being forced one way or another into that other world in which, after all, the two of you did not belong.

Behind all of this is the feeling that exposure is dangerous, that your true feelings must be hidden, and that the world is unsafe—hence your need for defenses. [...]

(I explained that in their different ways both Jane’s ESP classes, and the mail, reflect other aspects of public exposure, and that these too must have engendered resistance over the years. [Jane remarked last week to the effect that she wondered how she could get out of answering the mail, for example.] Class had always seemed to offer much, and has helped many people, yet implicit in its very existence was the fact of public exposure concerning unacceptable psychic abilities, in Jane’s eyes, I told her. [...]

[...] That is, we can work on it if we want to, but with no thought of deadlines or signing a contract, which would commit Jane to additional public exposure. [...]

[...] I know things aren’t that simple, but I do feel that the fact of public exposure represented by the Seth books has always bothered Jane. [...]

[...] People of no other age, historically speaking, have had to contend with the dimensions of public exposure that are now possible.

[...] But what’s the connection between eyes and the threat of exposure? [...]

That sort of exposure, in your terms, has not happened before, and of itself it forces both mind and heart to question some dictates that have been taken for granted in the past—for in the past almost any kind of destruction or war or violence was justified if it was done in God’s name, or if the soldiers were marching “on the side of right.”

(“Two again, like a double exposure.” [...] Double exposure, above, also has picture and artist connotations.

Two again, like a double exposure. [...]

Reasonable daily exposure to the sun is physically beneficial to him, and symbolically beneficial, in the sense that the sun is light.

[...] This is not necessarily a fear, say, of performing inadequately, nor a fear of exposure in ordinary terms. [...]

[...] Perhaps a relationship between the intent to publish the sessions, and the idea of exposure or threat for not “toeing the mark.” [...]

[...] Now he told me he had one exposure left, and he wanted to take a snapshot of me to use it up.

[...] No wonder we sought privacy more and more: any public exposure came to be avoided automatically, as part of the protective coloration.

[...] We usually keep her sketches covered, however, since their colors begin to fade after a few weeks’ exposure to light.

[...] This was followed by the legend: “Used On Highways Where Radiological Contamination Is Such As To Limit Permissible Exposure Time.” [...]

[...] The test object of course is connected to the photos also indicated on page 198, and these particular photos were connected with “other”s since they were the last two exposures on a roll of film.

[...] Finally, we were left hoping that the sinful self’s very exposure through its own material would eventually bring about some physical improvement. [...]