“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In the new experiments with Dr. Instream, involving clairvoyance, Seth said enough valid information would come through to keep up Dr. Instream’s interest, even though we would do better later on.

[...] The picture in the dream was partly subconscious guesswork with a touch of clairvoyance. Any such inner communications are basically the same in that they are picked up by the inner senses, whether or not the information is received as a telepathic communication or in terms of clairvoyance. [...]

(Remembering her success in clairvoyantly tuning in on Bill Gallagher as he made his business errands on the evening of October 8, Jane decided to try the same thing with John on Tuesday. [...]

(It was now time for the second clairvoyant test with the Gallaghers in Puerto Rico. [...]

(Jane mentioned the 4¢ postage stamp on the object; strictly speaking the stamp is not quite square, but if the stamp had been perceived clairvoyantly perhaps its shape was interpreted as a square.

(Some confusion of clairvoyant images here could have led Jane to assign the bust attribute of Lincoln to the three people on the line below the stamp.

[...] Clairvoyant material comes constantly. [...]

[...] Jane was concerned about blocking the nightmare data, wondering if it was perhaps clairvoyant. [...]

[...] As I have said often, evidence of clairvoyance, telepathy, or whatever, are not eccentric, isolated instances occurring in man’s experience, but are representative of natural patterns of everyday behavior that become invisible in your world because of the official picture of behavior and reality.

[...] In this specific case also, clairvoyance enters in, since the envelope test had not been held yet. [...]

[...] Seth has stated that such terms as telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, etc., are of but relative usefulness; perhaps this instance is but an example of the ability of part of the mind to dissolve the time barrier.

“The conscious idea of magic, then, is a mask, or contrived version, of the psyche’s innate clairvoyant, telepathic, and precognitive abilities. [...]

“I think that I brought my magical insight into consciousness also because of some of my recent dreams, that seem to contain precognitive and/or clairvoyant elements. [...]

(On the evening of August 5, Thursday, Jane and I mailed Dr. Instream a copy of the 175th session, held August 4,1965, and asked him to check the telepathic/clairvoyant information on pages 176-77. [...]

(Jane’s clairvoyant experiences continue. [...]

[...] There is no basic difference between telepathy and clairvoyance, as you term them. [...]

[...] I also emphasized the “evidential” material we had received — spontaneous clairvoyant demonstrations given in sessions and in the envelope tests that we conducted for over a year. Seth has given correct clairvoyant descriptions of people and events in other parts of this country and Puerto Rico.

Nor will we discuss clairvoyance, except to mention that such incidences may appear frequently within the sessions as Ruburt gains confidence. [...]

[...] They were all highly clairvoyant and telepathic, given to visions and hearing of voices.

[...] Then there is an undifferentiated level between wakefulness and sleep where you act as a receiver — passive but open, in which telepathic and clairvoyant messages come to you quite easily.

[...] On occasion he would fabricate a physical symptom to explain a sudden change of mood, that was instead the result of clairvoyant knowledge.

[...] The words “Clairvoyant Dreams” popped up from the cover, and we bought it. [...]

[...] My attitude was, “Well, let’s get this out of the way so we can really get down to the things we’re interested in, like telepathy and clairvoyance.” [...]

[...] This portion of your identity is quite natively clairvoyant and telepathic, so that you are warned of disasters before they occur, whether or not you consciously accept the message, and all communication takes place long before a word is spoken.

We were discussing the nature of perception some while back, and its relation to clairvoyant activities. [...]

When I spoke of interpretation of data in predictions, or clairvoyance, I was not speaking in terms of psychological interpretation.