“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] But you did not pick it out as your first choice. [...] And your own intellectual ideas prevented you from first picking out your intuitive choice, as far as the portraits were concerned. [...]

([Gene]: “I have no choice.”)

[...] He could try both for a while, but this would be by far the most difficult of choices, and I do not recommend it.

[...] Daring both in the choice of men, those who will represent the company to the public, and in the choice of men who will develop products, and this is an area with which you should become more familiar, for it is this upon which the company depends.

[...] Jane talked in her own voice all evening, although the choice of words, the rhythm and phrasing and inflections seemed not to be hers. [...]

(Yet I think more is involved than choosing among the belief systems offered by Eastern or Western cultures, for instance — that is, in more basic terms each personality would make that kind of choice before physical birth, with the full understanding of the vast influence such a decision would have upon a life’s work. [...]

[...] But the choice is with the inner self, which is the real identity. [...]

[...] There is a great difference between free choice and predestination.

[...] Such a choice has some drawbacks.

Even as you speak your sentence with such fine conscious nonchalance, inner choices are still being made, as you unconsciously check your communications against events occurring outside you as you speak.

(In interpreting those passages, I saw that Jane would have died, given her own choice, a couple of years ago, but her plan was interfered with by me and the hospital personnel. [...]

[...] Information about the probable future is also given to help you make conscious choices. [...]

[...] (Some physicists, however, have implied that subatomic particles—photons—communicate with each other as they take their separate but “sympathetic” paths.) Pardon my irony here, but Seth has always dealt with the ramifications of consciousness and maintained also that we do not inhabit just one probable world, but constantly move among them by choice—and by the microsecond, if one chooses.

Whatever the initial course of action agreed to in just this probable reality by everyone involved, from whatever point in the “past,” in Framework 1 the participants have subjected it to an almost infinite variety of choices and modifications through the years: but always—always—within nature’s great structure, and accompanied by the utter freedom of each person concerned to accept, reject, abort, or change the whole affair from their individual perspective at any moment….

[...] All kinds of choices are available, and the diversity of physical matter is a reflection of this deep source of variety.

[...] For your personalities in this existence, you both made the ideal choices. [...]

[...] I do not give you multiple choices—I want essays. [...]

[...] Now you are also the receiver of other such signals coming from other probabilities that are connected with your own, but you choose which of those probable actions you want to make real or physical in your system, as others also have the freedom of choice in their systems.

[...] There are always varieties of personal problems to be worked out, but the time, place and relationship is left to choice. [...]

There was choice also on her part, that is, they chose to be reborn at approximately the same time so that their ages made them contemporaries. [...]

[...] While both must be encountered, there is a great range of choice and activity. [...]

Free choice is always involved. [...]