“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

SESSION 135

(John Bradley, of Williamsport, PA, was a witness to the session. This is the first session he has attended since that of the 95th, October 7,1964. However John has visited us often since then, and is reading the sessions regularly.

(Perhaps because of the presence of a witness, Jane was nervous before the session began. Once again she dictated while sitting down, and with her eyes closed. She spoke quite rapidly, in a voice somewhat louder and deeper than usual, and continued in this vein throughout the session. She was also more animated than usual, and used much emphasis and many gestures. Pauses were quite rare.

I will here welcome Philip to our session. Since he is acquainted with our later material, I will continue along the same lines.

(After the session, Jane said she had no idea offhand just what material is on those particular pages of the Seth manuscript. But she does not want to look at them until she is ready to go to work on them.)

It is most pleasant this evening, with our small group. I am still working with Ruburt in an attempt to make the sessions more congenial, although necessarily it takes a while for him to become accustomed to our new method of delivery.

(See many of the recent sessions, particularly from the 125th on.)

Therefore, traveling through such distance would involve travel through the electrical intensities that go into the existence of any given action as it electrically occurs. This idea of action within action, of distance and movement within action, is a fairly new one in our sessions.

(Seth talked about this duality as long ago as the 25th session, in Volume 1.)

What I have been telling you this evening, and my discussions in all our sessions, all my comments, have been concerned with basic and simple facts, not alien to mankind’s nature, but more intimate to him than touch. The very fact that over one hundred and thirty sessions have been devoted to such ABC’s is, in itself, adequate proof of how mankind has indeed divorced itself from the nature of its own spirit.

(It is Friday night as I type this, two days after the session. To date Miss Callahan appears to be all right. Jane saw her at 3 PM, mail time. Jane has been picking up Miss Callahan’s mail as suggested, and also sometimes manages to look in on her at another time of day.

During our next session we will go more deeply into those pyramid gestalts of which we have spoken in the past, and perhaps consider from another viewpoint entirely the scope and nature that make up the idea of gods. Within certain frameworks these pyramid gestalts do have an electrical reality, but their existence goes beyond not the range but the nature of electrical reality. And because of the strength of their intensity, they are projected within every other field of actuality that exists.

I will now close our session. When the three of us are together upon some other occasion, then perhaps we shall see about your effects. Show me, show me, show me, Ruburt. And here you see this: Because Mark has seen what Mark has seen, our Ruburt is dubious. Why? Because Mark has seen what Mark has seen!

Mark’s abilities, while untrained, are excellent. He is naive and childlike. For this reason his abilities allow him to see what has been put before him. I would say more along these lines. However Ruburt would not take it kindly, and I am after all in his debt to some degree. My heartiest wishes to all of you. If you prefer, I will consider prolonging the session. However, we shall end it as usual if you prefer.

(End at 10:29. Jane was again well dissociated. John Bradley said the material was much harder to follow, when given verbally, than it was the last time he witnessed a session. It was much more complex. John also said he tried to communicate with Jane mentally while she was speaking, concerning his company, Searle Drug. But since Jane did not mention the subject John considered his efforts a failure, for whatever reason.

(Jane finished the session in good humor, particularly the comments on physical effects, Mark, and the like. And I am curious about my little puzzle.)