our

1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:135 AND stemmed:our)

TES3 Session 135 February 24, 1965 10/56 (18%) electrical distance intensities Callahan Mark
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 135 February 24, 1965 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

I will here welcome Philip to our session. Since he is acquainted with our later material, I will continue along the same lines.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

It is most pleasant this evening, with our small group. I am still working with Ruburt in an attempt to make the sessions more congenial, although necessarily it takes a while for him to become accustomed to our new method of delivery.

The Mr. Gottlieb of whom you have been speaking will soon find himself in other difficulties, I am afraid. We will now return to our other discussions.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

It is most difficult for you to contemplate the existence of that which is independent of its own materialization. This vitality fills all other forms while it is itself, in your terms, formless. But our discussions concerning the electrical universe should have led you into intangibles.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Therefore, traveling through such distance would involve travel through the electrical intensities that go into the existence of any given action as it electrically occurs. This idea of action within action, of distance and movement within action, is a fairly new one in our sessions.

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

What I have been telling you this evening, and my discussions in all our sessions, all my comments, have been concerned with basic and simple facts, not alien to mankind’s nature, but more intimate to him than touch. The very fact that over one hundred and thirty sessions have been devoted to such ABC’s is, in itself, adequate proof of how mankind has indeed divorced itself from the nature of its own spirit.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Most of our material will indeed be shown as valid. I do not speak in any of these matters as far as definite times and places are concerned, nor do I intend to. Ruburt is egotistical enough as it is, and you Joseph are so determined. We will continue on. The material will see wide circulation; and at a time when you are both able to handle such circumstances.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

I thought that you would understand this automatically, but apparently you did not. I am pleased with Philip’s interest on our behalf. And I do indeed keep my eye out, so to speak, on his behalf.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

During our next session we will go more deeply into those pyramid gestalts of which we have spoken in the past, and perhaps consider from another viewpoint entirely the scope and nature that make up the idea of gods. Within certain frameworks these pyramid gestalts do have an electrical reality, but their existence goes beyond not the range but the nature of electrical reality. And because of the strength of their intensity, they are projected within every other field of actuality that exists.

I will now close our session. When the three of us are together upon some other occasion, then perhaps we shall see about your effects. Show me, show me, show me, Ruburt. And here you see this: Because Mark has seen what Mark has seen, our Ruburt is dubious. Why? Because Mark has seen what Mark has seen!

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 128 February 3, 1965 electrical intensity shape dissection field
TES3 Session 131 February 10, 1965 electrical density denseness intensities field
TES3 Session 125 January 25, 1965 electrical intensity distance Lee incense
TES3 Session 122 January 18, 1965 electrical field system force protrudes