“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] When the erroneous belief systems and negativity connected with so-called rational reason apply, then it is as if our person sees the target, but instead of directing his attention to it he concentrates upon all of the different ways that his arrow could go wrong: It could fall to the left or the right, go too far or not far enough, break in the air, fall from his hand, or in multitudinous other ways betray his intent.

[...] She feels betrayed by the sons who left, and the father who stayed.

[...] Their dreams seem betrayed.

[...] It is also highly distorted, for your physical senses are lovely liars that betray you constantly. [...]

[...] If, for example, a point were to be made along these lines, the following could happen— Say that you wanted to express the human characteristics that can lead to disaster, that can lead a man to betray another. [...]

[...] The position was threatening because it represented a possible dilution of his energies from his main objective of writing, into a superficial ego satisfaction, which would have left him basically not only unsatisfied but personally betrayed.

[...] And it would indeed be a betrayal of you on my part to treat you in such a manner. [...]

[...] He felt that they betrayed you.

[...] When you give lip service to ideas with which you do not agree, you are betraying your own ideals, harming yourself to some extent, and society as well, insofar as you are denying yourself and society the benefit of your own understanding. [...]

In the meantime you had changed many of those ideas, and Ruburt felt betrayed and furious at you for leaving him to carry on these principles in which you had once so heartily agreed, in his eyes, you see.

He was a dear and loyal friend in another life, and you felt that he betrayed you, but he did not. [...]

For additional material on cellular life and death as mediated by Seth’s CU’s, or units of consciousness, see the 688th session between 10:26 and 10:59: “When the cell dies physically, its inviolate nature is not betrayed. [...]

[...] This was to help you save face: you didn’t take time out because you wanted to, but because you were so miserable that you could not work—and then yelled out in outrage that the body so betrayed you. [...]

The fact that you would say “I am giving you the opportunity to do this by my job” entrapped him further, for he felt basically that underneath this was another reason: that if you wanted badly enough to paint all the time that you would do so, that you should have done so, that you should do so, that you would and could have managed without jobs, particularly in the later years, and that you were betraying yourself and therefore him. [...]

[...] I consider this a betrayal—a small one, but quite indicative of your behaviors.

But again the term betrays (?). [...]

[...] At any level of your artistic development thus far, you could have cashed in with some application, and been, you felt, betrayed by money and acclaim as a certain level of development.

[...] You could be betrayed by your genes. [...]

[...] When they discover that this is not so, they feel betrayed. [...]

[...] It will not betray him. [...]