“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Bill Gallagher sees a dog-eat-dog world, and, as mentioned earlier, animals have an entirely different meaning to Bill.

[...] Your own animals and all the various species that you know belong to a general grouping, with man presently holding forth.

[...] Her manner had been pleasant and animated throughout. [...]

[...] In general, you might select animals to play the part of the enemy, or members of another religion, or political parties.

The bug’s cat construction is a huge and terrifying animal-mountain sort of construction. [...]

Numerous forms of vocal communication — whether “true” speech or not, in current opinion — undoubtedly existed among the ancestors of our species for many millennia before the appearance of late Neanderthal man, however; according to conservative estimates such methods could have been in use for well over two million years, perhaps beginning even with our prehuman or animal stages. [...]

[...] It knows precisely how many such “shocks” the psyche can take to advantage, which associations to animate through such intense experience and imagery, and which ones to leave alone.

[...] He wanted you to show even innocent animal affection. [...]

(“How about our killing animals for food?”)

You recall that I told you animals relied upon the psychic energy of their owners. [...]

[...] Many sessions ago, as many as a hundred or more, Seth told us that animal pets would reflect the psychic health and concerns of their owners.

[...] On your plane the brain is extremely important, and for your information many animals have a highly developed mind though their brains may be small.

[...] It is a human invention of which your animals are blissfully ignorant.

[...] For the intensity behind the perception reminded you of the unswerving attention often displayed in animals: a complete lack of trickery as it is understood by you.

[...] Peggy has a deep fear of animals in general and cats in particular, this being why Seth calls her the cat lover.

[...] That is, an animal head either symbolized on the item, or in the shape of it. [...]

Your animals possess a closer bond by means of the inner senses. [...]

[...] If they do, I remarked to Jane as I typed this session the next day, then Seth must have a great amount of extremely interesting information on those concepts in relation to animals, say, or birds, insects, and marine life — not to mention bacteria and viruses; perhaps, also, submicroscopic entities down to the molecular and atomic levels, or even “below,” are involved. [...]

[...] I’m thinking about androgyny, of course, which is the concept of both male and female in one, and/or of hermaphroditism, wherein a person or animal possesses the sexual organs of both the male and the female. [...]

[...] My body, I knew, would be animated, as Seth talked. [...]