“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This can be an advantageous way of understanding certain principles—and I may have well hinted of such analogies myself. [...]

I also think that if asked Seth would point out that since the concept of quantum mechanics is based upon the idea that everything we “know”—matter, energy, our sensual information—is made up of quanta, or the interactions of insubstantial fields that in turn, and quite paradoxically, produce very active subatomic packets or particles, then quantum mechanics is at least analogous with his statements that basically the universe is composed of consciousness itself. [...]

[...] If reincarnation is to be considered, their disturbed relationship this time might reflect past connections of a different yet analogous nature, and may also have important effects upon any future ones. [...]

[...] When you begin to get to the other side, continuing our analogy, and with good luck and perseverance there will be someone else on the other side constructing their own bridge to meet yours. [...]

Now taking our analogy of a long bridge, you are now here. [...]

[...] You might say, returning to our analogy, that there is more color-mixing within the dream state, and the materials are immediately at hand. [...]

[...] There is an analogy here, perhaps not flattering to Mark, but I do not mean it unkindly.

You see yourselves in physical form—the analogy of plants upsets you because you move about and plants are stationary. [...]

[...] You are tuned in to an earth song, following this analogy, but you are only following your own melody, and usually you are unaware of the greater orchestration in which you also take part.

“In actuality, following the image through, and strictly as an analogy, there would also be an infinite number of threads both above and below your own, all part of one inconceivably miraculous webwork. [...]

[...] Following through with our analogy, imagine yourself Self A. We will start you off in physical reality on Thread A, though you have already traversed many other threads to get where you are.

[...] When the ball goes out of sight, so to speak, you could say for our analogy that it goes into the future.

This would be true as an analogy if time were no more than a series of moments, or if the future were a definite but momentarily unperceived reality. [...]

[...] These inner senses, if I may use an analogy again, are like hidden underground trains that carry important fuel from one country to another.

Using air again as a simple analogy to our fuel for the inner senses, which is converted by the various countries or planes for their own purposes and therefore camouflaged, air in its pure state is not observed easily. [...]

I am never sure really if my analogies help matters or not, but here is another. [...]

That is the analogy. [...]

[...] Through the inner senses, and using a very simple analogy, you would not only see the street as you do or hear the few sounds that drift to your ears. [...] This experience would be instantaneous and would, using the analogy, include more than the usual data that you would receive from the outer senses. [...]

Now: In our book, I will be doing my best to explain the origin of your universe, and in such a way that most of the pertinent questions are answered, but man’s present concept of reality is so limited that I must often resort to analogies.

[...] Somehow Jane and I always understood, to make an analogy, that Seth’s kind of “simultaneous” reincarnation [or anyone else’s kind, for that matter] wasn’t acceptable in our Western societies at this time in history; we could trace out many reasons why this is so. [...]

(The “value climate of psychological reality” first mentioned in the [44th] session just quoted, is also dealt with through analogy in the 45th session. [...]

[...] Using an analogy, neither does consciousness exist as simple organisms separated by vast distances, but as a complicated gestalt.

A close analogy to this material can be found in remarks Seth made in the 682nd session for that first volume: “The idea of one universe alone is basically nonsensical. [...]

[...] As you will see, this analogy is a rather simple one that will do only for now, because past, present, and future do not really exist in those terms.

[...] This is not a good analogy particularly, but it is as if you received an important communication, say, three paragraphs of great import, with all the individual letters appearing, but not in their proper sequences, and gradually the letters would float together to form the proper words, and then the words would float together to form the proper sentences, and so forth.

[...] I used the above analogy to make the point that I made. [...]

[...] In some instances, to use an analogy, serious short circuits do occur, intensities of power accumulate. [...]

It may be thought of in an analogy, as a shadow, in that you create it or project it, but without conscious knowledge. [...]

([Dave:] “Tom made the analogy of health vs. [...]

([Dan:] “Theodore made the analogy of health vs. [...]