“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It has so many variations now in the world culture that it allows many individuals to move from one belief system to another while still safely cloaked in religious garb. [...]

[...] For many centuries creativity itself was firmly directed by Christianity, and to some extent (underlined) Christianity brings with it an air of uneasiness for society—to the extent that any original thought or insight must indeed imply an intrusive force to a world that must exist in a rare balance that is the result of preserving old values and obtaining new knowledge. [...]

You should be able to apply my comments about religion—the Jews and Arabs and so forth—easily to many of your own questions involving contemporary world behavior. [...]

[...] The world, or field, that you presently inhabit is real, definite on your level. The fact that its reality is only limited to your level, and does not extend to other fields, must not tempt you to discount it; and yet while you must behave in a large manner as if your universe were inherently and basically objective, you must still retain the knowledge that this apparent objectivity has great limits, even practically speaking; and a too-great dependence in a world of objectivity can lead to a psychic imprisonment which is unnecessary.

In a distant future, even in your field, the limits of the so-called objective world will clearly be known and demonstrated, and a great freedom for mankind will result.

[...] In many cases it is emerging into a new world. [...]

[...] Nevertheless yours is a slow-motion world in many ways as far as your perceptions are concerned, while you are within it. [...]

[...] Ruburt need not bear the weight of the world upon his shoulders (humorously throughout), nor take the responsibility of the universe. [...]

One of the main root assumptions of your popular world has been that the future does not exist in the present. [...]

[...] Your world is presently based so upon the ideas of cause and effect that precognition is frowned upon. [...]

[...] Some of the dreams did involve other probabilities, however, in which members of your family died at different times than in your world, as with the dream involving Loren (my younger brother).

[...] I thought this a very meaningful projection, reflecting her exaggerated feelings of responsibility to the world because of her psychic abilities. [...]

(Upon waking from her nap this afternoon, Jane again felt blue, deserted, and alone except for me in the world. [...]

[...] One and one is two—that is a fact in your world, and you can use that fact in millions of ways, but it involves no truth.

[...] You concurred in a good bit of this, often through unspoken attitudes, and through invisible example, but you got your backs up against the world, with chips upon your shoulders.

Ruburt felt he had to explain to the world, and he began to cut off experiences that he did not intellectually find decisive answers for. [...]

[...] In a way both of you wanted your worlds to meet. [...]

[...] Many new versions of reality appear first in art or fiction, and in such a way new ideas are spread through a society, while no threatening advances are made upon the world of fact. [...]

The authoritative world offers security and a certain amount of safety even in the spreading of new ideas, provided they remain in the artistic realm. [...]

[...] Many individuals come into a world for the purpose of changing it for the better, and there is no more efficient way of doing that than by the promotion of ideas—for no exterior altered circumstances can ever be applied from without unless the inner foundations have been laid.

(Very long pause.) As his abilities grew, however, of course he sensed the outlines of other realities, the glimmerings of other worlds. [...]

[...] In a large measure, those beliefs represent the evidence of the old world before it is set upon by the light of new creativity. Bounce against that world, into the more creative realm that you know in your heart is a far truer representation of reality,

[...] Because you have both utilized your abilities and tried to bring some release to that postcard world, your works have automatically resulted in a comfortable living. [...]

[...] (With continuing amusement:) To enjoy your work was suspect—and if you enjoy unconventionality of mind, some leisure in which to contemplate the world about you, then it is about time that you dismissed such parochial concepts, and realized that there is no moral rectitude given them. [...]

[...] I have said that the mind is a part of the inner world, but you have access to your own minds, which you ignore; and this access would lead you inevitably to truths about the outer world. [...]

Seth went on to emphasize again that we form the world of appearances as effortlessly and unconsciously as we breathe. [...]

[...] It is, however, a connective, a portion of the inner senses which we will call, for convenience, the second inner sense … It is a natural pathway, meant to give easy access from the inner to the outer world and back again.

By nature, leaders are not so much at odds with their world as they are ahead of it. [...]

Now, I want to stress that you must not emphasize your feelings that you are at odds with the world. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s physical condition becomes a materialization of those concepts, exaggerated, so that he is not able to go forth in the world, believing the polarity so great, with him and subjective activity having the disadvantage.

[...] For Bill does have significant psychic abilities that he inhibits for fear they will operate against his survival in the world of business.

[...] You have all kinds of opportunities now to recreate your personal experience in more beneficial ways, and to change your world.

Some who wanted to travel from the Old World to the New, may be reborn in the new one. [...]

[...] How can this be, she wondered: If a certain number of entities were responsible for the creation of our physical world, where do the extra human beings come from? [...]

[...] You must learn your lessons now in your own backyard before you travel to other worlds. [...]

[...] The personality may act in certain ways in the physical world as a result of a psychological experience. But these physical effects are secondary to the experience, and the experience of itself makes no physical effect upon the material world. [...]

Much investigation along the lines of so-called ESP is being carried on in the Western world. [...]

[...] But this does you no good at this stage of the game and so you are in the peculiar position, once more, of trying to dissect the inner world with camouflage tools.

[...] Will you then stop operating in a physical world of physical objects? [...]

[...] Earlier this afternoon I’d repeated my own grim assertion that putting oneself in Jane’s condition because of a fear of others, or the world at large, was untenable, and that I’d never stand for it. [...]

[...] That is, what purposes do diseases serve in our world, since they are so prevalent, and have always been with us? [...]

[...] The world of normal communication I call Framework 1, while Framework 2 represents that inner world, in which indeed all time is simultaneous, and actions that might take years in normal time can happen in the blinking of an eyelid in Framework 2.

If our ideas were already accepted in the world, there would be no need for our work. [...]

[...] On the one hand Jane, Seth, and I want to see our work presented to the world as originally conceived, as a way to offer ideas to think about. [...]

Now, I’ve said this before, you concentrate very nicely upon the similarities that exist in the phenomena of the physical world, and you ignore what is not similar of a large field of available data. [...]

[...] You can take a step out of the self that you think you are and the world that you think you inhabit. [...]

[...] In other terms, this can be likened to the discovery of a new world or land that has existed, of course, but whose existence was unsuspected. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s concentration so briefly upon Hoyle’s book was picked up by Ed Young, and Ruburt’s opinion of Hoyle’s world was picked up by Ed Young, who has the same opinion of the scientific establishment. [...]

as a whole new world in some

curled inside nature’s world

INSERTING NEW IDEAS INTO THE WORLD.

Our books are attempting to insert new ideas into the world as it now is, by combining the powers of the intellect and the powers of the intuitions — in other words, by closing the two ends of Prentice’s extremes.

Ruburt is anxious that Prentice present our books in the best light in the world. [...]