“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

It is simply a portion of you that she does not understand. To her it is a weapon that you have to force money from others, and a weapon you will not use. The word weapon is important here, for she believes that money must be forced from some unfriendly source.

[...] In your society money is like a weapon that you need to protect yourself. [...] You must completely accept the fact that you do indeed dwell in a safe universe—one in which you are free to develop, say, your painting abilities to the fullest, without fearing that that development will dull the weapon that brings you money.

[...] And because you still seem to believe that your universe is unsafe, all of your creativity must give you the weapon—money—to protect you against the inequities and uncertainties of “fate.”

[...] A nuclear weapon in the hands of the inhabitants of middle-age Europe would have been used almost immediately, and with nary a qualm, to wipe out all but Christendom. [...]

Now the weapons and the destruction are the obvious things that you see. [...]

[...] She did not want children, yet giving birth gave her a sense of power, the only sense of power she had experienced in this existence, and so she used this power as a weapon when she felt a weapon was needed.

[...] A nuclear weapon in the hands of the inhabitants of Middle-Age Europe would have been used almost immediately, and with nary a qualm, to wipe out all but Christendom. [...]

Now: the weapons and destruction are the obvious things that you see. [...]

[...] (With some irony:) It would not be entirely out of keeping, though somewhat exaggerated a statement, to claim that men who stockpile nuclear weapons in order to preserve peace are insane. [...]

7. And at various times through my early years, I understood how my mother used me (and my two brothers) as “weapons,” or tools or objects, against my father. “Weapons,” perhaps, is too strong a word, I think now, for I don’t remember my mother blatantly encouraging “her” children to defy their father. [...]

[...] It’s deadly because nuclear weapons are involved. Perception theory rests upon the assumptions of large groups of people in the two countries, including many of their leaders, and by the political rulers of many other nations, that it is vital for the United States and Russia to possess numerically balanced arsenals of nuclear weapons. [...]

[...] We’re still fighting our conventional wars, but now we have to face the threat of national or species disaster through the escalation of an “ordinary” war into one in which nuclear weapons are either accidentally or deliberately used.

(Positive suggestion is a powerful weapon, as Jane and I have learned personally, through trial and error. [...]

Civilizations do not rise and fall because of weapons, or economics, or technologies. [...]

[...] He does not consider it a weapon (humorously). [...]

[...] The fine and terrible weapon of the intellect should, indeed, terrify even the gods, for there it sits atop of your heads so sure of its function and its worth and its permanence, and its knowledge and it judges everything according to those rules which it has itself established. [...]

[...] One cannot use oneself as a weapon against oneself in those terms. [...]

[...] When others seem to hurt you, you use them in a way as weapons against yourself; and of course they so allow themselves to be used for their own reasons. [...]

[...] For enjoyment is a weapon. [...]

[...] We owned no previous weapons, ammunition, cleaning equipment, etc.

[...] Again, dissociation is not only your best weapon but also your most helpful tool in helping both of your parents.

[...] In your culture people use the term “intellect” almost like a weapon to protect themselves against impending disaster. [...]