“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] And the same material may appear from different viewpoints. [...]

[...] Unfortunately, no one examines the nature of mental reality from such a viewpoint. [...]

(Long pause.) The entire picture of physical life as you understand it must be of course experienced from your own viewpoint, but its complexity, its order and magnificence of structure and design should be understood as composing but one example of the infinite number of realities, each constructed by the propensities and characteristics of its own nature and the nature of its own consciousness.

They would seem to be the spirits of nature,² as you would be more or less bound to interpret them from your viewpoint. [...]

[...] The children did not know the session was taking place; from their viewpoints we must have appeared like three adults who sat talking, and closed the doors because they didn’t want to be bothered.

[...] What a heretical thought from the scientific viewpoint!) But each atom of whatever element is an amazingly complicated, finely balanced assemblage of forces and particles woven together in exquisite detail—one of the more basic examples of the unending and stupendous creativity, order, and design of nature, or consciousness, or All That Is.

[...] From its viewpoint, our reality might be as incomprehensible to it as its reality is to us—yet the two inevitably go together.

[...] The viewpoint is entirely different form the viewpoint of any other figures, however. [...]

[...] Because of your viewpoint this is highly difficult [for you] to understand. [...]

You must begin any study from your own viewpoint, from your own ledge, but your personal living experience is always the main source of information. [...]

[...] [This sometimes happens in class: Seth will elaborate upon book information, or discuss it from a different viewpoint; this in turn makes Jane and me want to see such material used in the book.])

[...] And Norma, of course, would turn all of this around and examine it from her own very independent viewpoint.

[...] Those plans gradually evaporated as I realized that it would take many pages to compare the two viewpoints in any detail. [...]

I’m sure that Seth would be the first to agree that consciousness obviously contains an unlimited number of viewpoints, regardless of which ones we humans may choose to call “true” at any particular time. [...]

[...] Yet not only are we on different sides of the same wires, but we are at the same time either above or below, according to your viewpoint, and if you consider the wires as forming cubes—this is for you, Joseph, with your love of images—then the cubes could also fit one within the other without disturbing the inhabitants of either cube one iota; and these cubes are also within cubes, which are themselves within cubes, and I am speaking now of only the small particle of space taken up by your plane and mine.

[...] There are certain planes which I cannot glimpse from my viewpoint, although I have greater understanding of these things than you. [...]

[...] We’re glad to try to answer questions like that, but our correspondents cover many topics and express many viewpoints—and some are hard for us to handle. [...]

[...] It is easy to say to you that such people could identify, say, with the trees, but an entirely different thing to try to explain what it would be like for a mother to become so a part of the tree underneath which her children played that she could keep track of them from the tree’s viewpoint, though she was herself far away.

(Jane’s “adventure in consciousness” was so rich,⁵ even from my observer’s viewpoint, that my attempts to describe it seem terribly inadequate by comparison. [...]

[...] I will continue to speak from my own unique viewpoint, but in your terms Ruburt is one of you, and his explorations, taken from your perspective, can be most valuable.

But although for Politics Jane drew upon the same transcendent experience I described in the opening notes for the 715th session, she did so in her own subjective way; in “Unknown” Reality I present my version of the event from an observer’s viewpoint. [...]

[...] It is only because your own viewpoint is presently so limited that it seems to you that physical reality is the rule and the mode and the purpose of existence.

[...] You have chosen your own illusion, and so you must accept it, and from its viewpoint must you try to understand the realities that exist beyond it.

In a way, Ruburt’s book (Psychic Politics) will continue our material from another viewpoint while you are preparing our “Unknown” Reality.

[...] It’s a somewhat chastening one, I said to Jane, joking, since it means that from Seth’s viewpoint we could be just two more individuals.

[...] The many people, and connecting rooms, represented the new structure of vaster beliefs that are all interconnected while you are still, however, concentrating upon the private creative self, and from that viewpoint viewing the world — hence your private corner in which you painted, as from that corner of private creativity you viewed the large interacting structure of new beliefs.

[...] In a way his book will continue our material from another viewpoint while you are preparing our book.

Action and consciousness are forever bound together, and we discussed the structure of the personality from this viewpoint. [...]

[...] Only by the use of the inner senses can you obtain a viewpoint that is to some extent free of your own system. [...]