“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] From that viewpoint the picture is entirely different, for you are indeed conscious while you sleep.

[...] I also saw the steps leading down, and the opened wooden door on the right, from my viewpoint. [...]

[...] But the balance between them, the two systems, is only apparent from your particular viewpoint, and not basic.

[...] There was an inverted quality about the dream, because you were looking at things from a different viewpoint.

In as simple a language as possible, and to some extent in your terms, the electron’s spin determines time “sequences” from your viewpoint. [...]

[...] I thought I was onto something from a fresh viewpoint, and at the same time was afraid that we’d heard it all before and that the idea meant little. [...]

[...] It stands on a wooden pedestal; the polished reflections in it seem to move as one’s viewpoint changes. We believe this is the oval shape Seth refers to, in light of his answer to my second question.

“They were not asleep to themselves, only from your viewpoint. [...]

[...] Discoveries in the “future” are quite apt to prove such limited viewpoints wrong. [...]

[...] From a larger viewpoint you would know that nothing had been destroyed. [...]

[...] If so, then, they would be strange only from our limited viewpoints.

[...] Within the context of my discussion, reincarnation is Seth’s historical version of his counterpart concept, which is that each of us is physically connected with certain other males and females who are living at the same time we are, and who are exploring physical life from a variety of viewpoints in ways that no one physical self could possibly match. [...]

[...] Not only are we on different sides of the same wires, but we are at the same time above or below, according to your viewpoint. [...]

Now: a few remarks from several viewpoints.

[...] They tried to play Psychic Developments Behind the Iron Curtain for example from a political as well as a psychic viewpoint, and decided to put more of their money into that initially for that reason.

[...] However, my viewpoint is not precise enough perhaps, but I have the picture of a door precisely centered, leading outward. [...]

[...] It does not rest in either of you alone, but rises from joint psychological structures (intently) that you have formed together, each using what characteristics you could—psychological structures that you then can use to gain a viewpoint upon reality that is so unique. [...]

From your viewpoint such a disintegration is, of course, not pleasant, but as the personality loses its focus on your plane it gathers itself together on another plane, and such a gradual gathering together is much more favorable than the surprise of a complete and sudden departure. [...]

[...] However, the Buddhists either have not gone far enough, or have gone too far, according to your viewpoint.

[...] Even though we could hardly be called impartial, we knew that in her long account of much that had taken place in Jane’s ESP classes, Sue had produced superior work both for herself and for us, through her viewpoint offering new dimensions and insights concerning what all three of us—four, counting Seth!—had been, and still are, trying to do. [...]

[...] The sinful self’s material serves as a small psychic source at the moment: That is, he still reacts to it, and the same material may appear from different viewpoints.”

I described that experience in The Seth Material, but because it rose from the world of dreams and is so connected with unconscious activity, I want to examine it from a different viewpoint here. [...]