1 result for (book:deavf1 AND session:883 AND stemmed:unimagin)

DEaVF1 Chapter 1: Session 883, October 1, 1979 4/57 (7%) divine progeny inflationary unimaginable sleepwalkers
– Dreams, "Evolution", and Value Fulfillment: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Chapter 1: Before the Beginning
– Session 883, October 1, 1979 9:06 P.M. Monday

[... 22 paragraphs ...]

(Pause at 9:57.) When that answer came, it involved previously unimaginable leaps of divine inspiration, and it occurred thusly: All That Is searched through the truly infinite assortment of its incredible progeny to see what conditions were needed for this even more magnificent dream, this dream of a freedom of objectivity. What door could open to let physical reality emerge from such an inner realm? When All That Is, in your terms, put all of those conditions together it saw, of course, in a flash, the mental creation of those objective worlds that would be needed—and as it imagined those worlds, in your terms, they were physically created.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Divine subjectivity is indeed infinite. It can never be entirely objectified. When the worlds, yours and others, were thus created, there was indeed an explosion of unimaginable proportions, as the divine spark of inspiration exploded into objectivity.

[... 18 paragraphs ...]

I told Jane that as far as I know the unimaginable explosion of the primordial superdense state, or entity, that resulted in the formation of our universe had been a straightforward event: Once begun, it kept going. There hadn’t been any fluctuations or on-off states balancing between the physical and nonphysical, for example. Science currently postulates this theory as its “standard model” for the creation of the universe.3

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

From my reading of Seth’s ideas of “in the beginning,” however, I’m sure he couldn’t agree with either the big-bang or inflationary models of the creation of the universe, even though his material may be evocative of portions of both theories. In physics, we’re asked to believe that this “extremely dense state” which began to expand was in actuality many billions of times smaller than a proton. (Protons are subatomic components of the nuclei of atoms.) Matter is a form of energy. Even so, I have trouble conceptualizing the idea that all matter in our universe, out to the farthest-away galaxy of billions of stars, grew from this unimaginably small and dense, unimaginably hot “original” state or area of being. I can see how such a concept can be postulated mathematically—but could it ever have really happened in ordinary terms?

Similar sessions

DEaVF1 Chapter 2: Session 884, October 3, 1979 particles meson protons smaller eccentric
DEaVF1 Chapter 1: Session 884, October 3, 1979 tradition geese straggling overcast divine
DEaVF1 Chapter 4: Session 897, January 21, 1980 Billy David divine model weather
DEaVF1 Chapter 1: Session 882, September 26, 1979 evolution creationism universe evolutionists creationists