“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] That is the you that you know — the world view that you understand. [...]

[...] I think that actually it’s worth excerpting from the session and keeping in view for future reference and questioning.)

I even think there’s good medical evidence these days for my view of Jane’s “symptoms,” as we’ve called them for many years. [...]

Considering the views of Seth, Jane, and me, reincarnational and counterpart existences and their ramifications may enter in as portions of such a refining process as we attempt to search out the dimensions of consciousness. [...]

[...] It is the daily ego’s ignorance and limited focus that makes it view so-called unconscious activity as chaotic.

[...] Because you view action in narrow terms, usually seeing it in physical terms only, you are inclined to think of it, or any effort, as a straight line from one point to another. [...]

I am making no recommendations, but hopefully adding to the information that you have at hand, and offering another framework from which you can view the situation. [...]

[...] But if you could view them each individual unit would have its poles lined up in the same manner. [...]

[...] The body in which our friend, Joseph, viewed his relatives (in the dream mentioned earlier) was not operationally physical. [...]

[...] Try to view normal physical occurrences as the concrete physical reactions in space and time to your own feelings and beliefs. [...]

[...] In the process, you see, your views of life are changing, and that change is showing that your creative abilities, if expressed, will automatically allow you to express your natures—your natures—and will lead you into your most advantageous way of life.

[...] Of course, his body does not realize that the pessimist’s views are the most intelligent, proper, sane and reasonable, and so it falls ill because the mind tells the body it has nothing to look forward to.

[...] It is an excellent idea to look at old sessions with a view toward picking up suggestions that I have given for constructive action, and following them.

As a species you could just as easily have smelled color rather than viewed it, you see. [...]

[...] It becomes quickly apparent that their view of reality is entirely different from their neighbors’.

[...] You view the fantastic variety of physical life — its animals, insects, birds, fish, man and all his works — with hardly a qualm; yet you must understand that the nature of consciousness itself is far more varied, and you must learn to think of an inner reality that is as infinite as the exterior one. [...]

[...] In her view, the quality called multipersonhood encompasses all of the inner personifications, or Aspects, of the source self, which she defines in the Glossary of Adventures as “the ‘unknown’ self, soul, or psyche; the fountainhead of our physical being.” [...]

[...] People often keep track of changes in hometowns that they may not have visited for twenty years except in the dream state, when they familiarize themselves with the alterations that have happened, visit beloved streets and houses, or view old classmates.

[...] I had an accident of some sort that left the truck half hanging off the road over a steep drop to the valley below; I had a view of this from below. [...]

[...] Rather importantly, however, your own view of the art world is changing for the better as you hear from individual artists in connection with our work, and those more positive feelings will definitely help now, where sometime earlier your feelings would have been somewhat detrimental.

[...] For all of their idealisms, both basically believed in a pessimistic view of the self. [...]

[...] It can view outward reality or turn inward, observing its own contents.

[...] See those other elements as characteristics of the image, view them as extended features that belong to you. [...]