“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The words that I speak to you transmit information, but the words themselves are not the information but verbal carriers. [...]

[...] It is difficult to verbalize, but your question “Why doesn’t the subconscious know when to stop, if its defenses actually become too dangerous?” is asked in too limited a framework, though I understand your concern and what you mean. [...]

[...] It wouldn’t even be verbal. [...]

[...] The experience, however, is circular, and therefore very difficult to verbalize or to organize into your normal patterns of information.

[...] It is a biological spirituality translated into verbal terms. [...]

“But Seth apparently just delivers his material verbally, and that’s it,” Jane wrote after reading my first draft of this note. [...]

[...] The anima serves not only as a personal but as a mass-civilizing influence, mellowing strongly aggressive tendencies and serving also as a bridge both in communicating with women in a family relationship, and in communication also as it is applied through the arts and verbalization.

This is one reason for the slow verbal communication. [...]

(Pause.) This is difficult to verbalize. [...]

[...] The concept has no verbal equivalent. [...]

[...] All of your written or verbal languages have to be based upon this biological “alphabet.” [...]

[...] In this session, in the words I speak — but more importantly in the atmosphere of the session — there are hints of those undecipherable yet powerful realities that will then, in your time, gradually be described in verbal terms that make sense to you.

[...] In these sessions we are translating basic realities into verbal terms, no mean accomplishment. [...]

[...] The psychological mobility of consciousness, however, allows for an inner kind of communication impossible to verbalize, an interlocking spiritual and biological language by which experience is directly transmuted. [...]

It is not easy to explain the workings of the inner psyche, or the activity behind dreams, for such experience exists beyond the framework of verbalization or images, and deals basically with the nature and behavior of psychological and psychic energy.

[...] The real communication is not verbal. [...]

[...] You can suggest that you will speak with distant friends, or convey important messages that you cannot convey verbally, perhaps. [...]

[...] You can’t verbalize it, but it was illuminating and helpful. [...]

[...] Again, we run into difficulties in explanation simply because there are few verbal equivalents for what I am trying to say.

[...] She thinks this may be why she doesn’t completely lose consciousness during sessions—so she can aid the personalities as they make use of her verbal discrimination.

Even my explanations to you involve a verbal dissection, which in itself distorts the very nature of the matter under examination. [...]