“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] He does not realize that on this level, now, and regardless of my independence and other issues involved, that he creates the personalities free of time, organizes them under the leadership of the conscious mind, and assigns them tasks of great validity and importance, which are then carried out.

[...] But that order would recognize the inner validity that is within the self; and the inner order, unseen, that forms the integrity of the physical body, likewise would form the integrity of the social body. [...]

[...] I am saying that lesbianism, homosexuality, and heterosexuality are valid expressions of man’s bisexual nature.

[...] True, the data was not as specific as it has often been, but it did contain a number of valid points. [...]

[...] This data can be related to the envelope object in a variety of quite valid ways. [...]

[...] Told myself then that I could travel anyplace safely and return safely but that I would go slowly; that I was safe and confident and would welcome such a valid experience. [...]

[...] are our names for the stuff of which we compose our images or transpose them into apparent validity. [...]

[...] But the incident made me think that it’s a pity nursing students aren’t taught valid facts of life, instead of the medical dogmas that often prolong illness. [...]

[...] Vowels and syllables exist as light as validly as they exist as sound.

Seth first mentioned The Nature of Personal Reality in Session 608, April 5, 1972, only shortly after Rob and I had finished reading proofs for his previous book, Seth Speaks: The Eternal Validity of the Soul. He actually began dictation on April 10, 1972, but our personal reality was suddenly disturbed when we were caught in the flood caused by Tropical Storm Agnes. [...]

[...] The consciousness that is within them is as valid and eternal as your own, however. [...]

[...] Other quite-as-valid events do not seem significant — they do not rise into perception, or reality. [...]

[...] [However, Jane and I freely admit that on occasion we’ve made the wrong choice in deciding to ignore what Seth had to say; in retrospect we’ve seen that he gave out very valid material.]

[...] Still, on another level the analogy is quite valid.

The tale has always appealed to children because they recognize the validity behind it.² The fairy godmother is a creative personification of the personalized elements in Framework 2 — a personification therefore of the inner ego, that rises to the aid of the mortal self to grant its desires, even when the intents of the mortal self may not seem to fit into the practical framework of normal life. [...]

(The first point I would like to make is that Seth told us enough of the clairvoyant material involving Dr. Instream is valid; this will keep up the doctor’s interest. [...]

The root assumptions that govern physical reality are indeed valid, but within physical reality alone. [...]

[...] They are, above all, valid psychological events. [...]

Study and practice with psychological time will show you the validity and strength of that inner self, so that you will clearly see that it is not completely bound to the so-called objective universe by any means. [...]

There are other dimensions, some of which you are almost ignorant, in which however you exist, or have some valid effect; where you are projected and where in one way or another you form a reference point.

[...] They are equally valid, and equally geared though in different ways, to your peculiar dilemma. [...]

[...] It constantly translates the components of its gestalt into reality, either physical reality through the EE units I have mentioned, or into other realities equally as valid.

[...] And again, it does not mean that you must smile constantly, but that you affirm your validity and grace within the dimensions of your creaturehood.