“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

It is true that a state can be produced in which such materializations can occur, by artificially producing the chemical imbalance necessary. [...]

[...] I have initiated the idea of motion, for true transparency is not the ability to see through but to move through. [...]

[...] The word itself hardly approximates the true reality it tries to portray however.

[...] It often seems instead that the opposite is true. [...]

[...] in the annals of our relationship was meant to lead you in one way or another to a place where the true nature of reality could at least be glimpsed. [...]

[...] The same was true of her singing, when she ranged from the most delicate soprano trills and nuances to powerful, much deeper emanations.

[...] And think what it means if it’s true!”

[...] The true dimensions of a divine creativity would be unendurable for any one consciousness of whatever import, and so that splendor is infinitely dimensionalized (most intensely throughout), worlds spiraling outward with each ‘moment’ of a cosmic breath; with the separation of worlds a necessity; and with individual and mass comprehension always growing at such a rate that All That Is multiplies itself at microseconds, building both pasts and futures and other time scales you do not recognize. [...]

The knot, or the main concentration of focus, in ego concern, prevents true refreshment, either through the inner self or from the outer world. [...]

It is true that the whole personality, or whole self, does not directly manifest itself within physical reality.

[...] He was not, then, afraid of death, knowing its true nature, and in the surrounding rooms there were other old people. [...]

[...] Because of such fears as I have spoken about this evening, many people never use their true creative abilities at all. [...]

[...] In a way each statement is true. [...]

Though this was true, the writing self for the first time began to question itself, its achievements, and the new field it had entered. [...]

[...] You must, then, take the next step and say, “It is not necessarily true, even though I believe it.” [...]

[...] Think of one of the most pleasant events that ever happened to you and the reverse will be true, but the process is the same. [...]

When you realize that you are much more than the egotistical “I am,” and that your true personality contains a much larger and really more powerful inner ego, then this relative inavailability of inner comprehension to the outer ego will not annoy you.

[...] There is no such thing as true psychological invisibility … The physical world is dependent upon the relationship of everything from electrons to molecules to mountains to oceans, and in the scheme of reality these are all interwoven with exquisite order, spontaneity, and a logic beyond any with which you are familiar.

They demand a certain discipline it is true, and according to your desire you will find the discipline easy or difficult. [...]

[...] A true realistic exploration of the nature of experience would automatically study that kind of emotional interrelationship, but while your society delineates the inner particles of matter, it avoids the inner psychological “particles” that form the most intimate experiences of your lives.

Some material he can present to you more clearly than I. This was particularly true up to this present point. [...]

(The material surprised us, and we had no thought of trying to relay it to anybody. We have no idea as to whether the tax matters referred to are true, and/or will develop. [...]