“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Two of these statements may appear at first glance to contradict themselves, but you shall shortly see that they do not, and you are left for now with a pretty question: for does the self, or identity, then form the perceptive dimension in which it exists, or is it created by the dimension?

I also think that if asked Seth would point out that since the concept of quantum mechanics is based upon the idea that everything we “know”—matter, energy, our sensual information—is made up of quanta, or the interactions of insubstantial fields that in turn, and quite paradoxically, produce very active subatomic packets or particles, then quantum mechanics is at least analogous with his statements that basically the universe is composed of consciousness itself. [...]

[...] In one of his early statements on dreams, Seth said:

[...] The next statement, about “A group... [...]

[...] Jane’s pay statement for November 30,1966 for instance shows a total of $36.00. [...]

It will often not be recognized for what it is, however, for there will be no evidence in the physical universe to back up its statements. [...]

[...] The artist, since he isn’t any kind of a scientist (even though he might be interested in science in general), attempts to grapple with the statement as best he can, in light of the feeling he has for what Seth is trying to say. [...]

[...] There are certainly deep connections between Jane’s apprehension of her true tone, and Seth’s statement in that session that each of us possesses certain qualities of feeling uniquely our own, “… that are like deep musical chords.” [...]

[...] This statement may seem contradictory but later you will see that it is not.

[...] In black and white print, this sounds ridiculous, yet, emotionally, the statement has a logic that speaks louder than all my deliberate suggestions to the contrary. [...]

[...] This is meant as a general statement however, for you are all subject to fluctuating circumstances, and are more or less able to use your abilities.

But that simple statement also means that our dream work relative to Jane’s challenges has often been powerfully abetted by Seth in many of the 347 completely private and 159 partially private sessions he’s given us since November 1965. [...]

(See the 26th session, and John Bradley’s statement.)

[...] Not being able to do this at the moment however, I did recall Seth’s very definite statements in the 49th session, page 63, concerning his most conservative attitude toward demonstrations.)

[...] I quoted that statement in Volume 1’s Epilogue, and now, after finishing my own work on the entire manuscript, I realize how truly apropos it is.

[...] The interesting thing about Seth’s statement is that with counterpart theory in mind one can gain a fresh appreciation of how underlying emotions and motives flow among certain individuals, sometimes surfacing in feelings of dislike, for instance, to whatever degree. [...]

[...] It would be clear to you that none of these statements contradicted each other, for in different circumstances apples behave differently.

[...] In that session also, Seth stated the above statement can be verified mathematically. [...]

[...] Seth’s information following this statement connected itself with the drawing easily enough, even to the “color gray,” which arises from the shadow effect I achieved in the drawing by using closely-spaced parallel lines.

This simple statement alone liberated Rob and me from all kinds of preconceptions that had inhibited our daily lives.