“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] But an equivalent exists; using an analogy, it is as if ideas are built up not through sentence structure reinforced by inner visual images, but by like “mental” patterns structured through touch and scent — in other words, thinking, but within a framework entirely different and alien to you.

[...] Seth repeated the last two sentences to make sure I had taken them down correctly.)

Dictation: I would like the sentence that I am going to give you placed separately on the page, in larger type so it is set off, and underlined.

The above is one of the most important sentences in this book in practical terms, and working within the framework of time as you understand it. [...]

(Very forcefully:) One sentence repeated is not the same sentence that it was before! [...]

[...] Then I read the two sentences Jane had given back to her, and she resumed at 3:59:)

[...] I heard their words with exceptional clarity, sentence by sentence, including the timbre of their voices, etc., and retained them briefly. [...]

[...] Geography is not one of her strong points, as the next sentence shows, but she has an unerring sense of direction.)

[...] That sentence is not distorted.

[...] I read the last sentence to Jane at 4:14.)

[...] What you were told was not given you in precise English, in intellectual terms, in paragraphs or in sentences. [...]

[...] Take that sentence to heart. [...]

[...] Accept abundance in whatever way it comes, and underline that entire sentence. [...]

[...] When you read sentences like the last one you are somewhat freeing your own minds, opening greater organizations. [...]

[...] IN A SENSE, ALL THINGS COULD BE CALLED FRAGMENTS … but the words were piling up in my head, and after the first few sentences were spelled out, I felt that sense of diving down into the unknown, of letting go. [...]

[...] Both of us were amazed that I’d spoken for so long, and delivered such involved sentences without corrections or hesitations of any kind. [...]

(Jane now sat leaning forward, quite close to me, eyes open, speaking very carefully, lightly and deliberately before leaning back after a few sentences.)

At these particular points whole conglomerations of new self units come into being, their origin sparked as given in the last sentence. [...]

[...] The question had been triggered by a sentence of mine in the notes for yesterday’s session, to the effect that I sometimes wondered why Jane’s body, particularly her body consciousness, didn’t simply take over to “even a more profound degree, and see to it that her physical body healed itself even more rapidly so that we could get out” of the hospital. [...]

[...] Spiritually the death sentence given you is another chance at life, if you are freely able to accept life with all of its conditions and to feel its full dimensions, for that alone will rejuvenate your spiritual and physical self.

(I felt a great sadness when Seth delivered this sentence.)

Underline the last sentence, and your own reply.

[...] Carla took Jane’s temperature — 98.4. I read the last sentence to my wife. [...]

[...] That last sentence is highly important.

(And in answer to my second question of the evening, Seth told me that he wanted the word “formed” used in the last sentence, just as he’d given it.)

The implications within that last sentence are, obviously, enormous.

[...] A spoken sentence has a certain structure in any language. [...]

(Jane explained that when I did this she was “already three or four sentences ahead” in the material, and the question forced her to look back at what she’d just said. [...]