“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The session went on as Seth gave Rob some excellent psychological insights into his own behavior, and tied this is with early experience in this life, and with relationships with his present family in past life existences. [...]

Also, Ruburt has experienced and used dissociation in his work, though to a lesser degree, before our communications and knows how to handle it… Our relationship will enable you both to deal more adequately with the outside world. [...]

[...] Now, this idea comes close to the relationship between the entity and its personalities. [...]

[...] It is much less than it was, and your relationship has done much to better that situation. [...]

[...] In your relationship with your parents for example, such a psychic expansion of self would allow you to absorb your own awareness of their sometimes painful existence, and you would feel no wound yourself.

(Long pause.) Such communications exist at all levels, but for his own personal reasons, and because of your relationship, Ruburt in particular tuned into your own greater personality with those attributes of love, deep understanding, and respect that often seem so difficult, it seems, to express adequately.

[...] The swearing bears a direct relationship to the mother’s language.

[...] The anima serves not only as a personal but as a mass-civilizing influence, mellowing strongly aggressive tendencies and serving also as a bridge both in communicating with women in a family relationship, and in communication also as it is applied through the arts and verbalization.

[...] Some of you may wish to have the sort of relationship that Ruburt and I have. [...]

[...] If an individual is meant, in his terms, to be born to you as a child, if he has decided to do so and if you have decided to have him as a child, if your past relationships for example have set up this situation, then the situation will take place. [...]

[...] We have put his concepts to work in our own lives, and sometimes both of us wonder how we managed daily life before we understood the close relationship between thoughts, emotions, and health.

[...] Here Seth discusses illness in its relationship not only to the surface personality but to our deepest biological frameworks. [...]

He also has some fascinating comments on the relationship of various kinds of symptoms to the inner problems involved. [...]

[...] We will have more to say concerning the ego’s relationship with the “unconscious.” [...]

The trouble has been that your scientists see or perceive electrical and chemical systems, for example, only in their relationship with the physical system. [...]

[...] The possibilities of your relationship had the power to bring about the fullest possible developments of your personalities. [...]

[...] (Pause.) Your own relationship, your private beliefs about the sort of persons you wanted individually for mates, brought about incalculable actions that led finally to your meeting — yet it all happened “quite naturally,” of course. [...]

[...] Learning processes are involved, and relationships. [...]

[...] But there are deep connections between yourself and all those individuals with whom you have had relationships, and with whom you were involved in deep decisions.

[...] Seth came through with some very interesting material on the relationship involving the three of us, as well as the communication between his reality and ours. [...]

[...] Do not fall for the trashy concepts concerning age—particularly in relationship to art, for there there is far less correlation than there might seem to be, for example, in conventional terms in other areas of life.

[...] They may write mysterious notes to each other, leaving them where they are bound to be found — yet notes using a special code or symbols or drugs, because too clear a communication would disrupt the entire relationship.

[...] As far as a relationship is concerned, however, you are looking at her from a distance. [...]

[...] I’m unwilling to ascribe the “conventional” notions of precognition or retrocognition to such a tenuous relationship between the two sessions. [...]

There will be all kinds of different spatial relationships for you to explore, and then to attempt to reproduce in your work if you prefer. [...]

[...] There is always a give-and-take in all such relationships.

Dictation: If you cannot trust your private self, then you will not trust yourself in your relationships with others or in society.