“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Jane also sensed more information pertaining to my questions of a few sessions ago, on the relationship of disease with human beings.

[...] I am not certain of the aunt relationship however. [...]

Ruburt is dealing with quite profound material involving the self’s relationship with its own source—this material being worked out in your current situations. [...]

[...] Feel the kernel of your consciousness rise as one of your seeds, higher beyond the knowledge of seasons, beyond the feeling of your days or moments, beyond the relationships of blood, beyond all those kinships which you take for granted. [...]

[...] I am speaking in general terms now, and in those terms such people are leery of human relationships. [...]

He has read a book that discusses massaging the feet in relationship with affecting reflexes in the body. [...]

[...] The beliefs boil down to your ideas of right and wrong, and they involve all of your attitudes concerning illness and health, wealth and poverty, the relationships of the races, religious conflicts, and more important, your intimate day-by-day psychological reality.

We will have more to say on all of these issues — but now I want to discuss spontaneity, or its lack, in relationship to sexuality and health.

symbiosis—in which the survival and health of each microscopic entity is dependent upon its own identity and its relationship with others. [...]

[...] The electrons within the instrument itself have a relationship with the electron that scientists may be trying to “isolate” for examination.

[...] Once such a relationship is set up between the ego and the subconscious, then communication in general between the two will always improve. [...]

[...] These are indeed questions that I could answer for you, but again, I prefer that you establish this intimate working relationship with your own personal subconscious. [...]

[...] Mathilda was a very nice person in many ways, despite the family relationships. [...]

(To Sue.) There was not a close—this is a PS to a PS—not a close, but a definite relationship between us in the past and it is for that reason that you were brought to Ruburt, to the classes. [...]

[...] Right now, however, see Jane’s essay on her relationship with Seth as given in the Introductory Notes for Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality.

[...] It schematically shows the relationship of the individual birth-to-death cycle (including probable events), to the other, successively less differentiated kingdoms or realities that help make up the world. [...]

[...] In notes at the end of this session I’ll briefly consider the latest expressions of large-scale consciousnesses concerning Three Mile Island¹ and the countries of the Middle East,² and then will unify those discussions by explaining how I think those great events of consciousness have counterpart relationships, just as “living” entities do.³ I’ll also refer to our country’s space-shuttle program.⁴ Next, I have to put into final form the complicated notes I began for a number of sessions for Dreams as Jane delivered them. [...]

Our relationship with nuclear energy, then, as it has been with warfare, is mainly adversarial: We still crave protection from our own creations. [...]

Moreover, I believe that counterpart relationships do exist between wars and nuclear energy. [...]

To me, privation theory and perception theory are interchangeable; they represent consciousnesses deeply exploring the misperceptions I’ve listed concerning violence, and the relationships involving the counterparts of nuclear energy and warfare.

(Pause.) For various reasons already given, concerning your joint relationship, and your own purposes (to me), it has taken some time for a newer, suitable framework to form itself — one in which Ruburt is free to pursue mystic experience in a practical structure; one in which unconventionality of thought is allowed to continue freely. [...]

[...] In your family relationship so far, so good. [...]

[...] We not only want to give necessary background information relative to the sessions themselves, but to offer glimpses into the very complicated emotional and physical forces that lie beneath close long-term relationships. [...]

[...] Among them were the resolution of some old family relationships — and nowhere in this note am I talking about past lives or probable lives, but just the working out of hard questions rooted in this present physical reality. [...]

[...] The length of time an individual has been dead in your terms has little to do with whether or not you will be so visited, but rather the intensity of the relationship.

[...] Their connections are good in waking life, but their relationship goes far deeper. [...]

This has to do in your terms with reincarnational relationships that I purposely have not given you.

[...] For the interconnections that exist between the two of you, several sessions would give you an excellent basis for understanding yourselves in relationship to one another. [...]

This feeling was heightened after a discussion in particular that you held in your room, and this is connected with your relationship, because he left his mother when he was sick of taking care of her. [...]

[...] Some of the relationships mentioned earlier involving those who did not come. These relationships were top-heavy, in a strange way, in that you gave so much of yourself that some of the others felt overburdened and not able to respond. [...]

[...] You were not your past “self,” therefore, though you shared a certain relationship. [...]

[...] Seth obviously elaborated on that material here, but instead of quoting it in Appendix 18 also, I thought of letting the reader first come across it in this session; and so, to whatever tiny extent, this additional information now alters each reader’s present reality by changing his or her conception of that Jane-Ruburt-Seth relationship.