“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The feeling-tone of Ruburt’s mentioned earlier in your terms, the negative one, was triggered as you know by his reaction to your illness, which was followed by rising difficulties on the part of your own parents. [...]

[...] His reactions were based upon the past and had to be brought up into the present, and worked through, and this largely has been done. [...]

[...] You will not be nearly so startled by the nature of your own reactions (reactone) if you understand beforehand for example that your consciousness not only is not imprisoned by your physical body, but (bud) can create other portions at will. [...]

Such a belief in extinction, such a certainty that identity is about to be blotted out in the next moment, is a severe psychological experience, that in itself can bring about unfortunate reactions. [...]

Then you are free, and the reaction is a good one. If you turn the other cheek without this understanding, however, and feel resentful, or if you turn the other cheek out of a feeling of pseudomoral superiority, then the reaction is far from adequate.

[...] The reaction is not blocked. [...]

[...] Your reaction, of course, creates new ones. [...]

[...] My stomach has been knotting up because I’m stewing over the reactions of those in charge at Prentice-Hall to Seth’s material in Mass Events about medical matters.

(We each described our reactions to Seth II and what we saw at the time.)

[...] There is a connection of course with his mother’s reaction, simply a habit pattern where she would tell Ruburt she loved him, and then in Ruburt’s eyes be cruel.

[...] Because of our own sympathetic reactions Jane and I often end up feeling frustrated; also, to help but a few people with any thoroughness means that we’d have no time left for the rest. [...]

To some extent you are still, and it is the image of the hammer that triggers your reaction, in that respect, so change the image and see it as a flower. [...]

She is, indeed, but that is not the reason for your reaction. [...]

[...] Reactions were excellent; she still receives an occasional call or letter about one of those shows in particular. [...]

[...] In Note 7 for that session I wrote that as an artist my intuitional reaction to that statement was to associate the multidirectional ability of the atom with Seth’s notions of simultaneous time and probabilities. [...]

(I think the important thing today was that as we talked we saw how with each category Jane described negative beliefs and reactions — an excellent point. [...]

Ruburt was quite instantly aware of his own reaction, and the several hours it took him to regain some sense of confidence. [...]

[...] His reactions to wintertime are also involved. [...]

[...] Take a poor day, a dark day for example, a poor habitual reaction, a handful of negative suggestions, and some symptoms, and it does not add up to much.

[...] As chemical reactions allow the body to utilize energy and form physical materializations, so the excess built up becomes, then, a propelling force, allowing action to flow in what you would call subjective directions.

This same chemical reaction must also occur, only more strongly, before a legitimate projection can occur. [...]

[...] This is simply a reaction to the returning consciousness. [...]

[...] I will speak later about last evening and about your reactions.

(I am afraid I did some half-humorous complaining about Seth’s reactions to my attempting to put off the session tonight; that is, I did not think I had been that impolite about it. [...]

[...] I couldn’t say too much, considering my own panicky reaction when I shoveled snow yesterday, but I did remark that we’d slipped back into the old ways of dealing with events.

[...] I was frightened by her reactions — appalled that after all we were trying to do, she still reacted to something beneficial — the coughing — as something to be scared of. [...]

Illness and Neurological Prejudice
Thoughts and beliefs as stimulating and directing probable cell reactions.