“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In those areas where you cut down on your impulses, upon their very recognition, you close down probabilities, and prevent new beneficial acts that of themselves would lead you out of your difficulty. [...]

[...] If the universe were structured as you have been told, the probability of my existence would be zero as far as you are concerned. [...]

(Pause.) The probability that this book would ever exist, itself, would have remained unactualized. [...]

The impulse allowed Framework 2 to operate, pulling in new probabilities. They are not “old” probabilities. No probabilities are old. [...]

(Certainly the Richard Bach-Eleanor Friede affair is reactivating a probability that was available, of course—or one could say that Jane decided to draw from Framework 2 those certain elements to work with in Framework 1. Interesting to see what happens.

(Our lives continue to expand in unexpected ways among an incredible variety of probable realities. [...]

(I told Jane that my dreamlike experiences last night had probably represented my trying out various possibilities regarding the fund proposal. [...]

[...] I’ll probably at least start it tomorrow. [...]

[...] And again, your purposes will be served if you make a habit in our sessions of asking me to check into immediate probabilities as far as health is concerned.

We can then change the probabilities, or manipulate them to your advantage. [...]

[...] Now you have not asked me, but if you give me a moment I will look into your probable health situation, and see what we find.

[...] I suggest however that you make a habit of questioning me concerning health probabilities as you go along.

As you probably suspected, this session will be barely short enough to call a session. [...]

You would most probably benefit at such times by reading again the specific material that I have given you along these lines. [...]

[...] I’ll suggest to Jane that we try to cultivate such a state by starting—again—a daily program of reading the material together, probably after breakfast. [...] It’s also that I think many things are left unsaid or unexplored in the sessions, probably because they are sensitive to Jane or she may block them on unconscious levels. [...] I even agree that such an argument may well be successfully solved in other probabilities, and that in larger terms that’s an entirely acceptable way for things to work within nature’s larger scheme of things. [...]

[...] I myself would put physical survival before anything else, obviously, at least in this probability. [...]

[...] I think a talent can be completely buried, or show up in probabilities, or be transformed or translated in a million different ways, as many ways as there are people. [...]

(To me:) When you consider your creative pursuits, trust the body of your creativity, and stop making judgments like this or that will probably never be done, or finished, and therefore limiting your probabilities. [...]

[...] As probabilities go, however, the child’s experience is enough to show it that such illness can indeed vanish overnight. [...]

We are also dealing with probabilities, and the information has to do with those data you finally accept as physical experience, why you accept it, where it comes from, and where those events “go” that you do not experience. [...] All of this is also intimately connected with those areas in which free will can be utilized, freely, to turn probable events into physically perceived ones.

“Probably he’s just getting back from the nearest galaxy,” I joked.

[...] There are many probabilities and there is no problem. [...]

[...] In one probability you have already done so. [...]

[...] I said I’d probably received her latest letter, but hadn’t answered mail for some time.

[...] “That’s probably why I had the session,” Jane said. [...]

Our own plans to relocate, however, plus those of the family next door (whom we’ll never get to know), reminded me of the material Seth gave at 11:25 for the 737th session, to the effect that any important decision we make organizes the patterns of probability set into motion: “This should be obvious … Unconsciously, then, the movers are in league with each other. There are sympathetic probabilities set up.”

[...] Yet the full picture of our moving should include not only the myriad probabilities growing out of our own actions, but all of the probable developments involving that house next door: Whatever happenings take place there — which we’ll help create — are bound to have their effects upon us.

[...] If you could properly understand all of that, then by looking into a single puddle you could tell the past and present weather conditions for the entire planet, and follow the probabilities in terms of storms, or volcanic eruptions. [...]

[...] In fact, towards death a great dream acceleration is involved as new probabilities are considered — a dream acceleration that provides psychic impetus for new birth.

[...] You would then experience one dream wrapped in another, or several occurring at one time — all involving aspects of a particular theme or probability, with each connected to the others, although to you the connections might not be apparent.

Probabilities can be juggled, tried out without physical consequences. [...]

[...] This existed in the present as a probability. You perceived this portion of the probable future in that present, reacted to it; and the probable transformation of yourselves into those images did not occur. [...]

This takes us into the problem of probabilities. [...]

In all of these instances however there are uncertainties, for probable future events can be foreseen as clearly as events that will more actually occur. [...]

[...] Your impulses, intuitions, and creative abilities have always innately provided open channels of communication through which man was guided toward those probable actions most beneficial to his private reality—and those actions would automatically, again, add to the best probable reality for the species as well. [...]

(9:49.) Those other characteristics, say, then, of the probable eggs and sperm, provide an infinite bed of personality characteristics and abilities that can ride to the surface if they are needed. [...]

[...] Probably no action on business affairs until after the holidays, which suits me fine. [...]

Ruburt’s dream of last evening, and your own, both draw excellent probabilities into the realm of physical actuality. [...]

[...] And I’m surely more than grateful that we have so much more to look forward to—that many years yet lie ahead if us, of creativity and freedoms of kinds that now we probably only can consciously dream about. [...]

[...] It was not a conclusion based upon fact, but a conclusion based upon a reason that applied to one probability only, one series of probable acts — or based upon the probable act of a disclaimer being used to begin with.¹ So again, what we are dealing with is an overall lesson in the way in which the reasoning mind has been taught to react. These are really instances where the intellect has been trained to use only a portion of its abilities, to zoom in on the most pessimistic of any given series of probable actions — and then treat those as if they were facts.

[...] It is as if an infinite number of orchestras were playing simultaneously (long pause), and each note sounded was also played in all of its probable positions with each other note possible, and in combination with all of the probable versions of the entire piece being played.

[...] “And here’s Seth saying that it’s actually happened that way—at least in some probable realities,” she said. [...]

[...] However, I told Jane, in his own way Seth had incorporated mathematical ideas in his material: I saw correlations between his probable realities, his intervals, and the concept of an infinite number of points on a line—and that some mathematical definitions of infinity are considered to be more basic, or of a greater order, than others. [...]

Both men and molecules dwell in a field of probabilities, and their paths are not determined. The vast reality of probabilities makes the existence of free will possible. If probabilities did not exist, and if you were not to some degree aware of probable actions and events, not only could you not choose between them, but you would not of course have any feelings of choice (intently). [...]

[...] There are three days left during which communication is most likely between you and your probable self. He is aware now of your existence, rather than only your probable existence.

[...] Most probably it would be a telepathic communication, but he may touch you, to see if you feel physical to him. [...]

(Yesterday Jane had what was probably her worst day yet—very uncomfortable indeed; she was in “a crisis situation,” as she put it. [...]

[...] A time and a rhythm occurred in which you both knew that therapeutic ventures, started now for many reasons could take quicker route—that is, you sensed upon a new probability. [...]

[...] Such periods happen often in a lifetime, of course—such intersections into probable realities, where you suddenly feel that the time is particularly right, or can be, regardless of the desperation or need or sometimes precisely because of it. [...]