“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Jane laughingly told me that if the new data “wasn’t good enough,” she’d probably never again hear from the people involved — but at this time we didn’t realize what was to follow.

This (precognitive ability) steers the cell through mazes of probabilities, while allowing it to retain knowledge of its own greatest fulfillment — the idea of itself, which is always alive in any given period of your time. [...]

[...] The inner impetus toward development, however, came from the innate comprehension of future probabilities. [...]

That earth-god portion of yourself attempts to direct you through probabilities. [...]

There are then, obviously, probable futures and probable presents. [...]

[...] In this probable evening (humorously) I select that probable alternative. [...]

[...] There are also probable pasts therefore, that exist quite outside your comprehension. [...]

(Actually, Jane continued, she found the material on probabilities intellectually stimulating, while wondering about its emotional connotations — the inferences that she was but one of countless billions of creatures, “blinking on and off like lights in all of those probable worlds …” What value was there to the tiny individual? [...]

(With emphasis:) Reincarnation simply represents probabilities in a time context (underlined) — portions of the self that are materialized in historical contexts. [...] Each self born in time will then pursue its own probable realities from that standpoint. [...]

[...] She also questioned the emotional value of the material on probabilities. [...]

[...] Shadows of all such probabilities appear within your own system, as oddities. [...]

The fetus also understands that it can respond to a stimulus — to any stimulus it chooses — from a variety of probable futures. So do you unconsciously grope toward probable futures that to one extent or another beckon you onward.

[...] Your verbal language — for your biological communication is quite aware of probable future events, and the body constantly maintains itself amid a maze of probabilities.

A simple tree deals with the nature of probabilities as it thrusts forward into new seeds. [...]

[...] Then see Note 17 for Appendix 12, wherein biological precognition and the cellular manipulation of probabilities are mentioned.

In a manner of speaking, and to a certain extent, one level of dreaming almost always involves a probable event that may or may not be actualized. [...] This occurs on a global basis, and is an everchanging process, for free will always operates, and the field of probabilities constantly changes.

[...] The plans of each person are registered, with all of their probable variations. [...]

In a basic manner, physical events are formed originally in Framework 2, where all the necessary computations are done in terms of probabilities, so that physical events then mesh properly in space and time.

[...] All molecular constructions exhibit that certain kind of introspective activity, as if the inner working of some giant computer was intimately in touch not only with its own programming and the probabilities connected with it, but with a deep psychological awareness of the activities of the electrons and various visible and invisible particles that form its own physical construction.

[...] It is retained in latent form within a kind of backup system, so that in terms of probabilities each species carries within its own genetic patterns the blueprints and specializations of each other’s genetic sequence.

[...] The pleasure principle can probably be likened most to the latent appreciation of beauty that is everywhere apparent if you look for it: the ecstasy of each form of life for the wonders of its own existence, in which love’s values go beyond themselves, and yet a condition in which each species or life form “realizes” that its own fulfillment adds immeasurably to the existence of all other forms.

Nature always works with probabilities. [...]

(I said that the near-daily routine of sessions probably compensated for their brevity — but also that we let much time go by that we could use for sessions. [...]

The human individual is aware of large numbers of probable activities. [...]

(With many pauses:) Dictation … The unknown reality, probable man, dreams, the spin of electrons, the blueprints for reality — all of these are intimately related.

[...] You do have free will, and in a certain fashion it can be said to be dependent upon the nature of probabilities and the multidimensional behavior of electrons.¹

[...] The great saga of recognized physical activity arises from a vast unrecognized, unpredictable dimension in which probabilities are allowed full freedom.

[...] Basically that portion of the psyche is outside of space and time, while enabling you to operate in it.⁴ It deals intimately with probabilities — (louder:) the source of all predictable action.

Now the channels this evening to probable selves are open rather clearly. [...] It will be different to each of you, for it is your own personal path into probable realities. [...]

[...] Let it become whatever you want it to become and whatever you need it to become in this particular time, in this particular place in this particular probability system in which you find yourself. [...] Let other probable selves help you as indeed you aid them. [...]

[...] Perhaps he feels that it isn’t needed at this time, that it’s simply better to just let Jane’s natural healing abilities do their work, now that that “corner in probabilities” has been turned.... [...]

[...] I’d told Jane to use suggestion so that she wouldn’t be bothered by whatever Roe might say, but suspected that Roe would want Dr. Kardon to examine the bedsores, and probably this would lead to a demand that Jane would go back into the hospital. [...]

[...] I still felt that surge of expectation and energy, as though we had somehow turned a corner in probabilities. [...]

[...] You are dealing with a world of probabilities. Now Ferd looked into a possible future, and this was quite legitimate—as a probable future. [...] (Pause.) In the precise moment in which you spoke the words, there was a probability, and a good one, that the event would occur as stated.

[...] These events did not occur, and another group of probabilities now exist.

Had your abilities been developed sufficiently, you could have seen through these probable futures into the actual physical future event that would come to pass. [...]

[...] But you perceived the probable future that did exist as such; and I do not mean it only existed symbolically. [...]

[...] Therefore, that world-probability in which telepathy and clairvoyance⁸ would have been common, well-known facts of life, self-evident in any civilization — that probability became latent while the species followed another route.

[...] — there are points, again speaking simply and in your terms, where probabilities meet: intersections with space and time that occur in your minds while you change directions, where new probabilities that once lay latent suddenly emerge.⁹ And in terms of your civilization and your time, such a time is now.

[...] Could reincarnational reasons be involved, probabilities, or what?”)

As you know, my dear Joseph, there is a difference between probable realities and reincarnational ones. [...]

[...] (Eyes open.) The woman’s death was foremost as far as probabilities were concerned, and yet at many points at the time of our session she could have altered those probabilities.

Had she taken the session to heart, the probabilities would have been altered. [...]

[...] One child will make out very poorly, with health and mental problems, if the probabilities are not changed.

[...] I am simply pointing out one probability that exists. [...]

[...] And it is spinning outward and inward into all probabilities simultaneously.

[...] [We hardly ever talk about whatever personal involvement either of us might have had with reincarnation, incidentally, regardless of whether any such lives would be based upon Seth’s ideas of simultaneous time and probabilities, or upon time as a series of successive moments.] Jane did know that the rest of the session would be for her, though. [...]

[...] Each reader can probably give similar illustrations. [...]

In your terms, probabilities are extensions and variations on the growth principle that is quite obvious in your daily reality. [...] Probabilities involve you with a rich psychological growth and development, present but not observable in your “home ground.” [...]

[...] It is natural for you to have probable selves as well as reincarnational existences.²

[...] To that degree you are aware of your own season only, and we will call it the physical one — the particular probable reality that you accept as real.

[...] To you, other people born now in 1940 would be born in a probable reality. [...]

[...] You accept, if you were born in 1940, a particular historical sequence: but others born in 1940 (in a different season than your own), are born into a different historical context, a different 1940, with its own probable events. [...]

[...] But you could choose to be born five “times” in 1940, and each existence would be entirely separate, as you probed into the probable realities existing for you in the variations of that period.

[...] I am alert to the fact that I am using many terms, and that it may seem difficult to understand the differences between probable and reincarnational selves, counterparts and families of consciousness. [...]

[...] If you ask: “How can I have reincarnational and probable selves at once?”, you are asking a question comparable to the one mentioned earlier, colon: “How can an apple have color and be round at the same time?”

When I speak in terms of counterparts, then, or of reincarnational selves and probable selves, I am saying that in the true symphony of your being you are violins, oboes, cymbals, harps — in other words, you are a living instrument through which you play yourself. [...]

To some degree you feel the same way when you encounter the concept of probable selves, or of counterparts. [...]

[...] You set probabilities into motion. [...] There are sympathetic probabilities set up.

[...] Today Jane and I very clearly felt those connections — or probabilities, if one chooses — developing. [...]

(Jane had declared before the session began tonight that she thought Seth would go into our house affairs in connection with probable realities, but that such material wouldn’t go with his book dictation on the families of consciousness. [...]

Your house hunting serves, however, as an excellent example of the ways in which Sumari are attracted to other Sumari, even in connection with probabilities in your system. [...]

On all other-than-normally conscious levels, however, you deal very effectively with probabilities. The cells maintain their integrity by choosing one probability above the others. [...]

[...] It weighs probabilities; it reacts to pressures of various kinds.

(Long pause at 10:51.) You become aware of probabilities, as actions sometimes that seem to have no connection with your own, but which are still related to them in that greater scheme of interaction that ordinarily you do not comprehend.

There is no probable solution, you see, to mankind’s difficulties, that is not being tried out in some probable system. [...]

Now, remember: in one way your reality is a probable system. [...]

[...] The information gained in each probable system is known, however, and correlated. [...]