“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“Have we reached that point yet?”)

A third point came up this morning, one we’ve talked about often lately. [...]

[...] As I said to Jane this morning during our long discussion, I still want to know why one portion of the personality would want to drive all of the rest before it, even to the point of destruction, and perhaps even beyond. [...]

The church at that point united the personality however, both parts of the personality agreeing on the definition of good. [...]

Your main point of contention is brought about by the emotional barriers that are caused by the difference in terms. [...]

[...] The reasons have to do with the particular way in which mankind has chosen to evolve and use his abilities; and I will have more to say regarding this point, but it does not belong in this chapter.

[...] The great question, then, is why those portions of the self would — and do — continue their terribly destructive ways, even to the point of bringing about their own death — for if allowed to, I think, death would be the end result, the final step along their chosen path.

[...] I had started feeling tired when I got to 330, so decided not to press any points. [...]

[...] Iran’s economy is actually at a very low point because its leaders have squandered much of its already reduced oil income on the war with Iraq, and on revolutionary institutions and food imports, while devoting little to the nation’s long-term interests. [...]

[...] the military one of perception theory—for again, I think the two are closely related, not only to each other but to the points I’ve made in this note. [...]

[...] Both countries passed the point of potential overkill years ago, but that doesn’t matter. [...]

[...] I had intended however to make the point clear earlier in any case.

[...] As we sat talking I told Jane that Seth had discussed some of the points mentioned in the envelope data, but that since he said good night I didn’t press for more information. [...]

(Jane pointed at John, her eyes still closed.)

[...] She is at this point like a child in the woods, but the potentialities are there for an excellent relationship. [...]

(I might also add here that in the short time since the bed was changed in position, so that its head points north, Jane has lost the persistent soreness of the ribs on her left side. [...]

[...] That is, the question as to the survival of the physical image after the point of so-called death, and the lingering about the physical plane of portions of the personality.

[...] Although she’s not entirely in agreement with me on this point, I think that essentially Jane is a mystic—not an easy thing to be in our extroverted, materialistic society, for it represents a way of life that’s little understood these days. [...]

[...] Several of the ulcers had been incipient for a number of months, although neither of us had realized what those circles of reddening flesh meant as they slowly blossomed on the “pressure points” of her buttocks, coccyx, and right shoulder blade. [...]

[...] The mobility, the point of mobility, represented moving ahead in his work, or not moving ahead. [...]

There are other elements not particularly mentioned in the background, but they are not crucial points. [...]

(Our discussion at break concerned several other points I thought readers might be interested in: One was the zealot designation Seth applied to Paul. [...]

I would like to make certain points clear. [...]

One small point here. [...]

Another point I wanted to mention. [...]

Seth has used several analogies to explain this point. [...]

[...] I will also take time to reconcile two points with which he is having difficulty, and to answer any questions that either of you might have since we have last held a quiet session.

[...] I suppose both sides scored points, or exchanged information, but I told them we weren’t signing any admission papers. [...]

[...] One point to our friend. [...]