“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Jane and I gave ourselves suggestions that we would perceive Dr. P at that time, but nothing developed.

[...] Maybe the whole thing is — reacting to ourselves individually and to the other person — experiencing our own personal reactions and then reacting to them — then reacting to the other person who experiences the same processes in himself. We … creatively keep altering ourselves and our mates. [...]

[...] Jane and I found much better answers for ourselves, even if they were — and are — only approximations of more basic, and perhaps even incomprehensible, truths. [...]

[...] I just wish I could present those sessions here, for in them Seth gave us much valuable information—not only about ourselves [including Jane’s somewhat impaired physical condition, her “stiffness”], but about the myriad interchanges occurring constantly between our inner and outer realities, or Frameworks 1 and 2, as he calls them. [...]

[...] Each day we have reminded ourselves to be careful. [...]

(I also stressed that our changing attitudes would be sure to change our attitudes toward others—that instead of trying to act “normally” toward strangers when they came here, especially when they were unannounced, we should simply be ourselves, secure in the abilities of our own natures; if any of these actions could be taken as “flamboyant” in a negative way, then so be it. [...]

Seth’s main idea is that we create our personal reality through our conscious beliefs about ourselves, others, and the world. [...]

[...] The rest of the session was taken up with matters involving ourselves and others. [...]

[...] I was glad to do it—and note that Jane’s class sessions usually are in marked contrast to those we hold for ourselves, for books or whatever in the future. [...]

[...] We’re composed of elements, chemicals, and atoms, and yet we speak and call ourselves by name. [...]

[...] We may be responding to the gods in ourselves — those inner sparks of knowing that defy our own three-dimensional knowledge.

[...] Jane went back into trance at 11:41, and delivered several pages of material for ourselves and others. [...]

It is good to be by ourselves again.

We have this evening been somewhat led astray, indeed, ourselves, from the main nature of the subjects at hand. [...]

[...] Jane and I had heard of this association in a remote way, but it had no meaning for us until we committed ourselves to the hill house; the agency concerned is but one of many we’d contacted; yet also involved is our friend Debbie, who works for another real estate firm, and who had first called our attention to the hill house. [...]

We will only concern ourselves with a few, those of which I am at least partially familiar. [...]

(“That’s why we wanted to get it fixed; and as you said, we did it ourselves.”

[...] In his exercise, we gently remind ourselves that we aren’t at the mercy of our past beliefs unless we think we are. [...]

[...] To that extent they activate, say, the entire body defense mechanism, and this is much more likely to happen than it would be if we addressed ourselves to each isolated symptom or individual problem. [...]

[...] To us, that concept is an exteriorized distortion of the “great council” that each one of us carries within ourselves. [...]

[...] We may even ourselves initiate such a program.

After the Seth sessions began, Seth told us that we, ourselves, had created the images of the couple, projected all of our negative attitudes into them and then reacted. [...]

We attempt to save even the shadows of ourselves, and we create light in even the darkest recesses of our own hidden fragments. [...]