“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] What seems to be a perception, an objective concrete event, independent and apart from you the perceiver, is instead the physical materialization of the perceiver’s own inner emotions, energy and mental environment.

[...] It represents a certain state of consciousness — an in-between threshold dimension of awareness, in which the imagination and the senses are almost caught in the act of putting an object together, or of bringing the world into a sensed reality, brand-new, from the realm of the inner mind: a very evocative state of consciousness, and one that as I believe Ruburt mentioned, you could also use in connection with faces.

[...] As a result, your evidence shows the much later reemergence of writing on more durable objects.

[...] If you or Nebene ever thought that objective details were important then see how important Ruburt thinks subjective ones area. [...]

This is the myth of the exteriorized consciousness — a consciousness that you are told is open-ended only so far as objective reality is concerned. [...]

The letting-go of effort should be also a mental and psychological stance applied not only to Ruburt’s physical dilemma, but to his—and your—relationships with the subjective and objective worlds. [...]

[...] You know that I have no objections to your friend’s presence. [...]

“But then, you’d hide it all from yourself,” Rob objected. [...]

“And now … the objects represent inner things we don’t recognize, and when we move them around, we rearrange the inner feelings too; or vice versa. [...]

[...] The painting, however, achieves a certain freedom from camouflage, although it cannot escape it, and actually hovers between realities in a way that no thoroughly camouflaged object could do. [...]

Seth went on to explain that the more camouflage (physical dimensions) an art object had, the less its validity to the inner senses.

[...] They were forced to describe what they saw by making comparisons with objects and events already familiar to them.

[...] In some they appear as natural phenomena, for example as various classifications of objects, in some as variations of sound or light. [...]

[...] The form will be produced directly by idea, yet it will be a definite form in objective terms.

[...] He must show that for all of his youth he is world-weary, not easily taken in, that he is objective—and only then can he allow his creative abilities to flow. [...]

To me, consciousness or All That Is is an omnipresent, really indescribable awareness that to us human beings has no limits, “one” containing not only the attributes of time and space and of all feeling, thought, and objectivity, but numberless other properties, manifestations, and probabilities that lie outside our very limited interior and exterior perceptions. [...]

Granted that our species’ best human understanding of “the mystery of life” and of the universe is exceedingly inadequate, still Jane and I do not think that nature is totally objective, indifferently cruel, or simply uncaring, as science would have us believe. [...]

[...] I thought such an old object might have some interesting impressions attached to it. [...]

[...] Yet such experience also does not have a physical reality, to the same degree that a definite physical object has.

In the same way your unconscious also transforms for you, from an otherwise undifferentiated maze of reality, fields of activation into recognizable objects and events in your daily life.

[...] These projections so far have never been understood, since they have not been studied objectively, but only in their relation to the physical field.

[...] In the entire act of perception, however, there is a oneness and a unity between the seemingly objectively perceived event and the perceiver. [...]

[...] Here is something objective that signifies what Ruburt once thought of as the threatening world. [...]

The emotional energy within the units is obviously the motivating factor, and you can see then why emotional energy can indeed shatter a physical object. [...]

The inner security that you attain is also a reassurance to him, for you can then be relied upon to operate with some objectivity, and he knows this. [...]

[...] Where your vision fails, you think reality ceases, so again you must train yourselves to look between events, between objects, within yourself when you do not seem to be doing anything. [...]