“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

“I am in this room, although there is no object within which you can place me. [...]

[...] While involved in the most intuitive work in the world, I tried to become more and more objective. [...]

[...] If Seth was what he said he was, then he should be able to look into time and space and closed envelopes as easily as you and I can see the objects in a room. [...]

[...] Other times he purposely used neutral objects. [...]

(Now Jane suddenly pounded her left fist on the table so hard that the cups and saucers and other objects jumped violently. [...]

[...] I have the impression of a great big round object… I don’t know what it is, and a favorite song of hers, I think having to do with violets. [...]

[...] Each spoon that you touch, each flower that you rearrange, each syllable that you speak, each room you attend to, automatically brings you in touch with your natural feeling for the universe—for each object, however homey or mundane, is alive with changes and comprehension.

The waking state, then, has its source in the dream state, and all of the objects, environment, and experience that are familiar to you in the waking state also originate in that inner dimension.

You can imagine atoms and molecules forming objects with little difficulty. [...]

[...] If you objected it meant you did not.

If you did not object, it meant you did not care for the sessions. [...]

[...] Those situations might have been too devastating for us otherwise, too emotionally threatening, too charged for us to present them with at least the minimum amount of objectivity required by the written word. [...]

[...] Ruburt, involved in highly avant-garde work, always tried to make sure he had both feet upon the ground—in his terms, to be fairly objective. [...]

The increased appearance of his ability creatively, as seen in his own writing, should be apparent to you Joseph, and is objectively apparent in the letters he has received. [...]

[...] In recent weeks alone, my work has improved remarkably; I am objective enough about it to be able to see this. [...]

[...] Jane on the other hand had received visual data on many inanimate objects, particularly lights, light fixtures, door fixtures, etc.)

[...] They may not be perceived as physical objects, but as reality that conforms to the particular camouflage structure within.

[...] It has not been used, and objects. [...]

[...] The objects of the world then become important not only for what they are but because of their standing in an inner world of meaning. [...]

After vocally and otherwise objecting for a good eight years, he stopped outwardly objecting. [...]

[...] You have so concentrated upon the categorization, delineation, and exploration of the objective world that it surely seems to be “the only real one.” [...]

Objectively — whatever the appearances — storms, earthquakes, floods, et cetera, are quite necessary to the well-being of the earth. [...]

[...] Many of them object that they did not want to be born in the first place, and they feel that way because they have so thoroughly repressed the will to life within them. [...]

The objects in the physical universe are but symbols to express other realities existing within private realms. [...]

[...] The sessions in one of the volumes published by Rick are accompanied by my drawings of the objects used in the series of “envelope tests” we conducted, both for ourselves and long-range with a well-known scientist, over some 11 months.

First I looked at various objects in the living room, such as a vase, a painting on the wall, a plant, and so forth, and tried to let my mind’s eye travel around these objects so that I could clearly picture the far side of them.

(10:10.) In Western culture since the Industrial Revolution (after about 1760), the idea grew that there was little connection between the objects in the world and the individual. [...]

[...] They became objects to be categorized, named, torn apart and examined.