“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You possess an unconscious environment, a given psychological world attuned to the physical one, and your learning takes place in it subjectively even as objectively you learn exterior manipulation.

[...] Look at a natural object, say a tree; if it is spring now, then imagine that you see it in the fall.

[...] These will involve the utilization of some of the inner senses, for which you have no objective sense-correlations. [...]

When children draw objects they are successfully, then, turning the shapes of the exterior world into their personal mental experiences—possessing them mentally, so to speak, through physically rendering the forms. [...]

[...] You are everywhere surrounded by photography of all kinds, but in those days images outside of those provided by nature’s objects were highly rare.

[...] Visual data consisted of what the eye could see—and that was indeed a different kind of a world, a world in which a sketched object was of considerable value. [...]

Later, as man insisted upon more objectivity of a certain kind, he determined that images of men should look like men—human beings, with weaknesses and strengths. [...]

[...] The test object was the front of an envelope mailed to us by Jane’s father last July. [...]

(See the tracing of the test object on page 101. [...]

[...] “A border” regarding the test object does not ring a bell, but “Horizontal lines that are similar to each other,” are the postmark cancellation lines. [...]

[...] Between sounds, between objects, not in your thoughts but between your thoughts, and there you will find answers but not to questions that you postulate in a demanding manner. [...]

[...] Do not take anything for granted this week, either that objects are stationery or that time goes from one moment to the next. [...]

[...] He explained that due to the construction of the wharf one saw just to the left as he looked out the front room in question, that it would be quite difficult to see as small an object as a rowboat tied up there; the wharf is quite high, and due to the slant of the beach a small low object like a rowboat would be hard to see.

[...] As particular portions of matter are transformed, as the inner self, through the inner senses creates a simple material object that is picked up by the outer senses clearly as, say, a table, so are these other constructions that closely mirror inner reality that are perceived by the outer senses as effects.

There is an emotional bond that is important in the setting up of such contacts, and what is clear in such clairvoyance may take in certain objects or situations that are perceived, not because of their logical cohesion, but events or situations which the emotional bond makes significant.

[...] The page pertains to the 76th envelope object.)

[...] And the truly hilarious part of this is that such seemingly subjective data will enable you to cut through objective, or so-called objective, reality in a way that will give you so-called proofs, that you can achieve in no other fashion.

[...] Your so-called scientific, so-called objective experiments can continue for an eternity, but they only probe further and further with camouflage instruments into a camouflage universe.

You cannot have so-called objective experiments when you are surrounded by, and dealing with, and intertwined with, the elements of the camouflage universe. [...]

[...] Focusing upon a camouflage objective will give you a camouflage result.

The name Carol is called Arparka now you have seen a physical object behave in a manner in which no physical object has a right to behave. [...]

With Ruburt this involves an aping, or adoption, a symbolic attempt to become the hated object, and therefore to be free of any hatred that might be directed by that object toward Ruburt.

(Seth hasn’t often talked about UFO’s — unidentified flying objects — in the sessions. [...]

[...] Now, so strong is this tendency for vitality to change from one apparent form to another, that what you have here in your flying object is something that is actually, as you view it, not of your plane or of [whatever] plane of its origin … The atoms and molecules that structurally compose the UFO, and which are themselves formed by vitality, are more or less aligned according to the pattern of its own territory. [...]

[...] In considering “immortality,” mankind seems to hope for further egotistical development, and yet he objects to the idea that such development might involve change. He says through his religions that he has a soul indeed, without even asking what a soul is, and often he seems to regard it, again, as an object in his possession.

[...] Then the creator of the thought perceives the object, and he does not understand the connection between him and this seemingly separate thing.

[...] Identify all the sounds if you can, mentally placing them with the objects to which they correspond even though the objects may be invisible. [...]

[...] However, in this world you are surrounded by familiar objects, details, and ideas, and your main orientation is physical so that you can operate through habit alone even when you are not as well focused within your reality as you should be.

[...] No longer connect up the sounds you hear with their corresponding objects. [...]

[...] I am not only objective, I am also, perhaps unfortunately, given to bluntness.

[...] There was no objective evidence on which I could base this feeling, yet I sensed it. [...]

[...] In the beginning the experiments would involve such simple procedures as having the Gallaghers, while at their home, focus upon objects Jane and I have not seen, at appointed hours during sessions held in our own home.)

[...] And a frank as well as objective attitude on the part of Dr. Instream in his letters would also help.

[...] The dream state appears chaotic, shadowy, suspicious, or even meaningless, precisely because in life you are so brilliantly focused in daily reality that dreams appear to be staticky objective background noise, left over from when you sleep. [...]

[...] Your physical experience is a combination of dream events interlaced with what you call objective acts.

[...] not only without physical environment in terms of space and objects but without the intimate physical environment of the body that now you take so for granted. [...]

[...] Even imagining concepts as physical objects will help you. [...]

(Rubbing from the piece of burlap used as the object in the 62nd envelope experiment, in the 269th session for June 20,1966.)

In the dream state you deal with objects that may or may not have a physical reality. [...]

The world’s evidence, the objects, sensations, and so forth, should be respected and enjoyed. [...]

I have told you that the ego, generally speaking, is self-conscious action that attempts to set itself apart from action and to consider action as an alien object. [...]

(Copy of the card used as the envelope object in the 81st experiment, in the 310th session for January 9, 1967.)

First of all—this is not the object—I pick up the impression of a merge of some kind, in which our Doctor is involved.

[...] This is our object. [...]

The object is the left shoe or slipper, purchased in a shop on a side street, directly off from a main street. [...]

[...] First of all, you must understand that no objective reality exists but that which is created by consciousness. [...]

[...] You think that objects exist independently of you, not realizing that they are instead the manifestations of your own psychological and psychic selves. [...]