“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The number 23 in connection with this. Perhaps the person, a man, died at 23, or 23 years ago, but the number 23 is somehow connected. [...]

(“A connection with sep, as in September, or the number designated by that month.” The number is 9. Near the bottom of the first column in her story Peggy writes that Mrs. Berry learned of her election victory soon after the polls closed at 9 PM. [...]

A connection with Sep, as in September, or the number designated by that month. [...]

[...] There is no 414, numbers in this sequence, on the object. There are several groups of numbers however. Among them are 417, bottom left corner on the back of the card, and 149 as part of the ZIP code number of our address.

[...] The only 8 on the object, although there are 28 other numbers on the object, including the denomination on the stamp.

[...] There are two combinations of numbers containing five and one on the back of the object: M-1065 in the upper left corner, and 14905, the ZIP code on the lower right.

[...] [Class sessions aren’t numbered.] Occasionally Jane has wondered what effect, if any, the break would have on Seth’s book. [...]

(“Number twenty: If everything exists now, or at once, how can it be added to through constant creation and expansion? [...]

[...] Number twenty-one: How do you account for the pain and suffering in the world?” Many people have asked us this question.)

[...] To many portions of the inner self then, what you would call a moment would correspond to an almost limitless number of moments, for even physical time has no meaning without experience without action.

[...] The whole self could and does perceive a limitless number of such moment points simultaneously. [...]

Art often appears timeless to the ego because it often merges within it a greater number of moment points than the ego can ordinarily perceive.

[...] You perceive certain very limited aspects of a given number of such moment points. [...]

3. Following Seth’s material in these paragraphs, then, there are of course a number of other Janes and Robs busily living out their lives in a cluster of associated probable realities — and all of those Janes and Robs are just as real to Seth as we are. [...]

[...] Moreover, this event had taken place in the apartment house we lived in on Water Street; not in our own quarters there, however, but in the apartment of another tenant whom we’ve known for a number of years.

[...] Seth named a number of counterparts among class members in the 732nd session — including, for example, a total of nine involving Jane and me (counting the psychic relationships between us) — and I wrote about those connections in Appendix 25 for that session.

[...] Nor is the fact that a number of us are physically separated (or invisible to each of the others) of great importance, for as Seth told us recently in a private session:

[...] Since her death many have written to both sympathize and to ask “Why?” She had Seth, didn’t she — for whom she spoke for some 21 years; she also produced six books with him along the way (plus a number of books on her “own”). [...]

[...] (I had a number of personal experiences and insights that I thought enhanced concepts of the Seth material, for example.) But what to cut, when to stop? [...]

(“And the same number of times for Jane and me?”)

(“All right, we’re ready for lesson number one, or a message.”)

([The Gallaghers:] “A number of places might fit that description.”)

[...] I’ve read that mathematical prodigies are in love with their numbers, and rely upon their dependability in an often unsure world. [...] This psychological growth, and the many challenges involved, set her work apart from the mental calculator’s numbers or the musician’s notes, which are ever the same: Those friendly columns of figures, for instance, add up to identical sums in any language. [...]

[...] Because she has to deliver it linearly in words, which take “time,” she cannot produce her material almost at once, as the mathematical prodigy can his or her answers, but in their own way her communications with Seth are as psychologically clear and direct as the calculator’s objective products are with numbers, or the musician’s are with notes. [...]

(Number twenty-seven: Is evolution, as it is commonly thought of, a fact or something greatly distorted?

(“Number twenty-eight: Have I painted any portraits of Speakers?”)

(“Number fifty-two: In the 429th session for August 14, 1968, you said: ‘Also, minutes and hours have their own consciousness.’ You didn’t elaborate.”)

(“What was the house number?”)

(“What is the street number of the house Doris and Sam live in?”)

(“This is the street number?”)

(We watched In Search Of from 2:30 to 3:00, and the program reminded me of a number of questions I’d thought of at various times. [...]

[...] After all, I hadn’t given Maude our phone number — though I plan to — and we’ve maintained a distance from her and others who have offered help. [...]

There are rhythms that exist, as I have mentioned before, and over a period of time, had you the time to check your records you would see that overall we have about the same number of sessions over a yearly period. [...]

[...] In an out-of-time reference, theoretically speaking now, an infinite number of directions can be followed at once. [...]

[...] Those serve to organize individual action in a world where an infinite number of probable roads are open—and here again, private impulses are basically meant to guide each individual toward avenues of expression and probable activities suited best to his or her development. [...]

(Jane and I continue to work like mad, typing the final copy for Oversoul Seven number two and for Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality. [...]

So some Americans have become tired of this badge of individuality, and they are ready to throw it over, either to fundamental Christianity, which is again rising, or to a number of various Eastern religions. [...]

[...] I gave him the names and phone number of Kathy Hagen, the Blue Cross supervisor who had seemingly turned down our major medical claim, and read to him the statement as to why that Andrew Fife had given me yesterday afternoon. Then I gave Pete Mary Krebs’s phone number, in Utilization Review at the hospital; she determines the level of patient care, reviews medical records, etc. [...]

[...] I’d thought A. Fife mistaken yesterday, but he’d repeated the same thing to Pete, and gave him file and form numbers. [...]

(All in all, the whole affair is proving to be quite instructive in a number of ways. [...]

The soreness that he does experience sometimes at night is of less intensity than before, and it happens when the body is in the middle of one of those overall processes, so that a large number of muscles and joints are being exercised at one time.

[...] Many people rushed out to buy the book at once, and are impatiently awaiting Volume 2. Many booksellers ordered “Unknown”, sold many copies, and then returned large numbers. [...]

[...] I’m marking the photo with this session number, for possible future reference.)

[...] The number 12. [...]

(“The number 12. [...]

The number 12 did refer to the address. [...]

[...] We also compare it with the number 12 data, wherein the numerals in the dentist’s address became scrambled with the idea of people in his waiting room. [...]