“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It operates to form as complicated a gestalt as possible, following the law of value fulfillment, and yet in so doing it does not either invade, deny or negate other individual consciousness. [...]

[...] (“Regular” electrons, as we think of them in our world, are negatively charged.)

[...] You may have tuned out what you think of as negative feelings or programming. [...]

[...] I would have been tonight, also, had I even thought of it—that is, I would have negated such a performance until I had the chance to study the implications of my reactions, in the light of my insight of Monday night, and Seth’s excellent session following that insight. [...]

[...] We considered that Jane was reacting to suggestion here, but were rather surprised since Jane knows how to guard against negative suggestion as a rule.

[...] You will see here that indirectly but clearly we have given you the identity of the person whose death is foreseen, particularly when I add to the positive statement, though it may appear negative, that your mother, Joseph, is in no way involved.

[...] They did not saddle the body with negative beliefs of disease or limitation. [...]

[...] Both positive and negative elements were more quickly creatively materialized. [...]

[...] But never negate the present reality of yourself because you compare it to some idealized perfection.

[...] If you actually construct your own experience, individually and en masse, why does so much of it seem negative? [...]

Well, one may ask, if a so-called negative quality like depression has a genetic foundation, what about the genetics for a positive attribute like joy—or, even, something like reincarnation? [...]

Before presenting the promised excerpts on the magical approach, I want to note that Seth is simply saying that from Framework 2 (and possibly from other frameworks) we draw whatever information we want in whatever way we choose to focus upon it: positively, negatively, magically, literally, skeptically, and so forth. [...]

Now, Ruburt has largely dispensed with the negative state of mind that has so long plagued him... [...]

[...] This is not to negate your own quite personal involvement, but only to show that other strong issues also help make that involvement possible.

[...] In the 9th session for December 18, 1963, Seth explained what we had been up to, and called our creations “fragments of our selves, thrown-off materializations of your own negative and aggressive feelings.” [...]

[...] There are so-called classic cases of schizophrenia—and borderline ones, so-called—but in any case the label is highly misleading and negatively suggestive.

“He need not feel that all sessions must be book dictation, nor feel that he is in any way negatively responsible, as he sometimes does.”

[...] This makes for a series of ugly surprises along the way of our travels with Prentice-Hall, since they always seem to involve money in a negative way, or royalties being withheld, etc. [...]

Through all of our challenges, we were aware of at least some of the incredible variety of positive and negative world events in the news—the bombings and the peace talks, the sports contests and the religious controversies, the national strikes and the latest developments in the arts. [...]

[...] Unfortunately, in your society you need every good suggestion you can get, to offset fears and negative conditioning.

([Joel:] “You don’t just automatically think good things about this fellow and then repress the negative thoughts and never even become aware that I felt...”)

[...] They are not negated. [...]

[...] Not so much in interpretation as the fact that some terms may be negatively suggestive, or that you may put emotional connotations where they do not belong.